Saturday, December 7, 2013

Nelson Mandela Is Burning In Hell! Awesome!

It's not a stretch of the imagination to say that the United States of America is on the edge of complete and total economic, political, and social disaster. The socialist scam known as Obamacare is ravaging the economy and destroying the greatest healthcare system in the world. The NSA is spying on American citizens instead of Islamonazi terrorists. The Infernal Revenue Service has become the Democrat Party's personal Gestapo, harassing the political enemies of the unholy Obama Regime. Homosexual "marriage" is being pushed down the throats of the American people by commie liberal judicial oligarchs who would sooner use the Constitution as toilet paper than actually defend it, as they have sworn to do. And oh yes, before I forget, the limp-wristed Republican't "leadership" in CONgress is either collaborating the the National Socialist Left, or too stupid to see what's going on. (At this stage of the game, does the reason why even matter anymore? The damage is done and may very well be permanent.)


To say following today's news sucks would be the understatement of the year.


Then, a magical, wonderful thing happened. Nelson Mandela dropped dead and got a one way ticket straight to Hell where he belongs.


You see, ladies and gentlemen, despite what the lapdogs in our arrogant and useless media will tell you, Nelson Mandela was the absolute scum of the earth. He allied himself with the murderous Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. He trained in terrorist camps in Algeria. He thought Fidel Castro and Yasser Arafat were righteous dudes. He founded the Umkhonto we Sizwe, or "Spear of The Nation" terrorist group. Mandela's African National Congress (ANC) also ran "reeducation camps" in Angola, Tanzania, and Uganda that would have made Pol Pot jealous. As the president of South Africa, he did nothing to stop the farm attacks that have claimed countless Afrikaner lives and had all kinds of fun singing "Shoot the Farmer, Kill the Boer."


I know there will be those who credit Mandela with ending apartheid in South Africa and this couldn't be further from the truth. Mandela didn't give a damn about liberating anyone, he just wanted his Xhosa tribe to dominate South Africa's government. If you don't believe me, you can always ask the Zulus of the Inkatha Freedom Party (an American-style Conservative party of the Zulu Nation) who survived the ANC's vicious attacks in the 1990's. Their crime? The Inkatha Freedom Party wanted independence for the Zulu tribe and didn't believe that violence was necessary to end apartheid, since the vast majority South African whites (the only people allowed by the ruling National Party to vote at the time) wanted it gone. Just like segregation in the American South, apartheid was a government institution, not a social one. (Apartheid was originally started in South Africa by labor unions to keep non-union blacks out of the gold and diamond mines. In other words, it has the same origin American labor unions do.)


The bottom line is this, gang: This is not my Martin Bashir moment. Everything I've written above can easily confirmed with a nifty little journalism tool I like to call "Bing". (With enough patient supervision, even a "reporter" from the New York Slimes could have found it.) Nelson Mandela had no right whatsoever to die with the comfort of  top-notch medical care that is denied to most South Africans despite the fact that it's a right guaranteed by the South African constitution (that Ruth Vader Ginsburg thinks is better than the US Constitution). He should have been executed for his crimes, just like any other mass murdering pig.






Thursday, October 31, 2013

Stupid Is As Republican't Does

Fellow Conservatives, the time has come. The time has come to free ourselves from the lackluster idiocy of the Republican't party and go our own way. The time has come to tell the political operatives like Tokyo Rove to shove it. The time has come to turn off FOX Snooze once and for all. The time has come to tell the crony capitalists on Wall Street to earn a living in an actual free market instead of leeching off the besieged American taxpayer.

In short, ladies and gentlemen, it's time for a third party. It's time for a third party that understands freedom. It's time for a third party that respects the Constitution. It's time for a third party that understands that only when individuals make their own choices and live their own lives, can America rise again from the depths it has sunken to.

To illustrate this point, let's take a look at a breathtakingly stupid remark from the Weeper of the House, Johnny Boehner:

***

"We want to repeal Obamacare and replace it with patient-centered healthcare."

 http://cnsnews.com/news/article/barbara-boland/boehner-we-want-repeal-obamacare


***

Despite the fact that government run health care is collapsing all around us, with trillion dollar deficits, war wounded veterans told to go to hell, and a website written in BASIC by Canadian flim-flam artists, the highest ranking member of the Republican party in CONgress wants play statist mastermind (H/T Mark Levin) and create his own dystopian (and blantantly unconstitutional, regardless of what John Roberts thinks) healthcare system.

I don't know if this is sheer ignorance or willing collaboration with Chairman Obama and His Merry Band of Fascists, nor do I give a damn. There simply isn't enough time to ponder that anymore. The country is dying of a stab wound in the back. Yes, the Dhimmicrats did all the stabbing, but it was the Republican'ts who handed them the knife when they folded and funded  Aktion T-4...I mean, Obamacare. In other words, in a perfect world where career politicians could be tried for passing laws that were blatantly in violation of the Constitution, the prisoner's dock would be bipartisan.

Yes, I'm fully aware that there were those like Ted Cruz, Rand Paul, Mike Lee, and a small handful of others who fought the good fight against Obamacare. They should be commended. But let's face it, gang, they never had a chance. They were badly outnumbered, with enemies like the Mensheviks in the Republican't party, the Bolsheviks in the Allahu Akbar party, and the misery pimps in the arrogant and lazy media surrounding them.


The bottom line is this: The United States of America is on the edge political, economic, and social disaster. It's pretty obvious that Republican't party is no position to save the day, and to be perfectly blunt and honest, it has no desire to do so.

If that isn't reason enough to form a third party, I don't know what is.


To the NSA agent reading this post: My name is Alan Levy. Not only do I approve of this message, I wrote it.

“We want to repeal Obamacare and replace it with patient-centered healthcare.” - See more at: http://cnsnews.com/news/article/barbara-boland/boehner-we-want-repeal-obamacare#sthash.Tuu8Lq0O.dpuf
“We want to repeal Obamacare and replace it with patient-centered healthcare.” - See more at: http://cnsnews.com/news/article/barbara-boland/boehner-we-want-repeal-obamacare#sthash.Tuu8Lq0O.dpuf
“We want to repeal Obamacare and replace it with patient-centered healthcare.” - See more at: http://cnsnews.com/news/article/barbara-boland/boehner-we-want-repeal-obamacare#sthash.Tuu8Lq0O.dpuf

“We want to repeal Obamacare and replace it with patient-centered healthcare.” - See more at: http://cnsnews.com/news/article/barbara-boland/boehner-we-want-repeal-obamacare#sthash.Tuu8Lq0O.dpuf


Tuesday, October 22, 2013

"It's The Law Of The Land!" And Other Annoying Crap

There are many things that annoy me in this world. I get really annoyed when people point with their middle finger. I easily lose my patience when some lackwit tries to explain to me that legalizing marijuana would pay off the national debt. And of course, it really fries my bacon when some maggot infested liberal commie pig wearing an unwashed Che t-shirt calls himself an American.

As highly annoying as the above is, there is something that is slowly but surely becoming even more aggravating. That, ladies and gentlemen, is the phrase: "It's the law of the land", especially when it's used by career politicians and the useless cable news talking heads who enable them to defend Boehner/McConnell/Obummercare or to rip Conservatives like Ted Cruz, Rand Paul, Mike Lee, and Louie Gohmert a new one for daring to attempt to live up to their oath of office.

I don't want to get into a lengthy discussion about how only the Constitution is the law of the land. I know that and you know that. (And if you don't know that, blame your civics teacher who thought her union membership was more important than teaching you.) It's a matter of fact, kind of like two and two makes four and there's no such thing as "climate change".

What I do want to discuss is how dangerous that wretched statement is.

You see, when hacks like Harry Reid and Juan McLame say "It's the law of the land", they're not talking about defending Boehner/McConnell/Obummercare, regardless of how much they tell you how that they care about the uninsured, "bipartisanship", and all the rest of their political buzzwords. After all, none of them have read all 2700 pages, and even if they did, none of them would have a snowball's chance in Hell to understand it. (Look at the IRA's favorite CONgress critter Peter King, just to toss a name out there. He takes off his shoes to count to ten.) What they're defending is the power they've grabbed for themselves. Basically, they now operate under the assumption that any law they pass is now carved on two stone tablets, totally unalterable by man. In other words, they're building what Mark Levin calls "a soft tyranny".

Then there's Will McAvoy...er, uh, Bill O'Reilly (I get the two confused since they're so alike.) and the rest of the mentally challenged hangers-on in the Cable Snooze circuit actively pushing this propaganda. Whether they're being "Fair and Balanced" or doing their best to "Lean Forward", they're helping to set what's left of the Constitution on fire. In some cases, like with Ed "The Red" Schultz and all the rest of the miscreants at PMSNBC, this is intentional. In other cases, like the McAvoy Factor on FOX, the host simply doesn't know any better and doesn't care to know any better. (O'Reilly... McAvoy...You say "tomato" I say "tomato".)

Here's the bottom line, gang. We're on the edge of complete economic, political, and social disaster. The Boehner/McConnell/Obummercare fiasco shows that the Republic is on life support, waiting for the death panels to put it out of its misery.


Wednesday, October 16, 2013

Fuck you GOP, Fuck You.

I hate to be rude, I hate to be crass, but you know what, ladies and gentlemen, I've had it. I am sick and damn tired of of voting for a party that mocks me, torments me, and worst of all, collaborates with the fascist pigs in the Democrat party to destroy The United States of America in the name of "bipartisanship".

In short, I no longer consider myself a member of the Republican't party. I'm done. The GOP can go fuck themselves. I have had more than my share of being the political world's version of a Cubs fan, always waiting to the next election, only to heartbroken by an inevitable collapse, just like the one we saw today when the Weeper of the House Johnny Boehner surrendered and gave Hugo Hussein Obama damn near unlimited power by pissing away The House's power of the purse .


I don't know about you dear reader, but I absolutely refuse to support a political party that doesn't share my love for this country and its founding. I absolutely refuse to vote for slimy corporatists and crony capitalists who will back any law, cut any corner, and stab their own mothers in the back to keep their Wall Street masters happy. I absolutely refuse to vote for a party that, for the most part, is completely  indistinguishable from the National Socialists in the Democrat party.


From here on out, I will NEVER vote GOP EVER again unless that individual is cut from same cloth as Ted Cruz. Mike Lee, Rand Paul, Louie Gohmert, and a few precious others. So, in my case, when Marco Rubio (who in all fairness did stand with Cruz against Obamacareless, but at the same time wants to import Democrats from Mexico) is up for reelection in 2016, I'll be voting for either the Libertarian candidate, the Constitution Party's candidate, or who knows, the Rent is Too Damn High Party's candidate. When Rick Scott, another spineless blob of wet cardboard who pissed himself at the moment of truth when it came to Obamacareless begs for my vote, I'll give him the same treatment I'm giving to Rubio: A vote someone else, anyone else. When the RNC comes begging for my hard earned money, the only thing they'll get from me is a picture of me extending my middle finger.


I know there will be some who will say by doing this I will only be empowering the goosesteppers in the Democrat party. That's a load of bollocks, to shamelessly rip off Gordon Ramsay. It's pretty obvious voting for the Republican't party does that and does it spades. (Yes, I said "spades". Spades! Spades! Spades!)


Fuck you, GOP. Fuck you.

Saturday, October 12, 2013

Peter King : Court Jester

Recently, Peter King, the court jester of the House of Representatives, had this to say to PMSNBC's Andrea Mitchell about Tea Party heroes Rand Paul and Ted Cruz:


***

"I'm really more concerned about why more Republicans around the country didn't join me in denouncing Ted Cruz. We now have people on the sidelines coming forward who we have to take a stand here. We cannot allow our party to be taken over by the likes of Ted Cruz and Rand Paul. I mean, these are people, isolationists, I consider them RINOs, because they don't represent traditional Republican principles. Ted Cruz, what he did here, was lead the party into a dead end with no strategy, somehow convincing a number of House Republicans that we just sent this to through Senate as far as defunding and closing down the government, he would manage to get Harry Reid and President Obama to back down. He never had a plan. It was fraudulent from the start. And we have to cut this guy off now."


***

Ok Pete, Since you asked nicely, I'll tell you why no one in the grassroots of the Conservative Movement hasn't flocked to your moronic position. In fact, since I'm such a nice guy and I kind of feel bad for making fun of someone who's day late and a few chromosomes short, I'll type it nice and slow and use all caps. Ready, Pete? No? Frankly, I don't give a damn. Here it is:


WE. DESPISE. YOU. 


Ladies and gentlemen, as we are all aware, the horror that is dog eater Barack Hussein Obama being installed as President of the United States by his willing collaborators in the arrogant and lazy media wasn't the sole cause of the rise of the Tea Party. The Tea Party came into being, in part, as a reaction to the final years of the Bush Error. (Hat tip to the Great One Mark Levin for being one of the few individuals in the media who actually understands this.) We were sick and tired of the constant growth of government under Bush's "leadership". We were annoyed at the warp speed pace that Bush and his GOP-E cronies were added to the nightmarish deficit. We were sickened by the attempt to grant illegal alien scumbags amnesty. In short, we decided that we wanted nothing do with Bolsheviks of the Democrat Party or the Menshiviks of the Republican't party.

Pete, that means you. Last time I checked, you goosestepped right along with your GOP-E comrades during this very painful time in American history. It was slobs like you that gave us the Department of Homeland Security (which really sucks at stopping terrorism--see the Boston Bombing for further details), sexual assaults at airports, Mediscare Part D, the NSA perverting the Patriot Act into a domestic spying plot, and all the rest. Your record, and the record of your comrades, absolutely sucks, Pete.

And, since we're telling it like it is Pete, it was RINO's like you that helped propel our Indonesian raised Fuhrer into power. The Republican't party was as useless as male nipples during the Bush Error. Sure they cut taxes and did a reasonably good job on the War on Terror, but did nothing to check the power of the out-of-control Federal Leviathan. Did you and your comrades jettison the unconstitutional Department of Education? No, instead you dumbasses ensured further federal interference in education with the "No Child Left Behind" scam. How about the EPA, Pete? What did you and your comrades do about its lawless ways? Nada. Did you and comrades tame the Department of Labor? Nein. Did you folks at least kill the utterly useless Commerce Department? Geen. You and your ilk didn't give the American people any reason whatsoever to support the Republican party, so they didn't, and now we're stuck with a guy who wants to start World War III and be on al-Qaeda's side.

Here's the bottom line, gang: If the Republican't party won't carry on the fight to protect the We the People from the fascist plot that is Obamacare, then We the People need to take it to the next level. Perhaps we could use Mark Levin's idea to amend the Constitution as outlined in his book, The Liberty Amendments. Or, perhaps we should seriously consider saying sayonara to Tokyo Rove, Court Jester Peter King and the rest of the Old Boy Network that is the GOP-E, and form a third party.


It's now or never.....




Tuesday, October 1, 2013

Marxists Say The Darndest Things

Recently, our Dear Leader, Barack Hussein Obama, had this to say about the government shutdown in between bowls of chicken poodle soup and attempting to start World War III:


***

"And in keeping with the broad ramifications of a shutdown, I think it's important that everybody understands the federal government is America's largest employer."


 http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/transcript-president-obamas-sept-30-remarks-on-looming-government-shutdown/2013/09/30/87437ea6-2a10-11e3-b139-029811dbb57f_story.html


***

And there, ladies and gentlemen, is the root of of all of our economic ills, our social ills, and our political ills. The Federal Leviathan has grown so massive and Chris Christie-like it can't support its own weight anymore.

Now, keep in mind, this isn't an ideological point of view. I didn't rip this from the brilliant brain of Thomas Sowell. I didn't pull this from an Ann Coulter book, nor I did I come to this conclusion by watching FNC (AKA---Fox Neocon Channel). I came to this conclusion by simply being an observant person. The signs of Big, Slovenly Government are everywhere. To be perfectly blunt and honest, I can't think of one thing, not one blessed thing, that the Federal Leviathan doesn't have its overfed snout in, and I'm willing to bet every fiat dollar I have that you can't think of one thing it doesn't regulate, either. The government is everywhere, telling us what kind of light bulbs to use, how much water our toilets should use, listening to our phone calls, and reading our emails.

And what has this brought us, precisely?

The nearly limitless number of government employees, federal agencies, and mindless bureaucracy didn't make us safer, as both 9/11 attacks would attest. All the trillions upon trillions of dollars dumped into useless social programs still has yet to end poverty and racism. The government can't even deliver mail, something it's supposed to do, without going billions of dollars in the hole. If this wasn't so tragic, the whole situation would make a great comedy.

Regardless of what dementia-addled moonbats like Harry Reid claim to think, no one is calling for anarchy. (Equating limited Constitutional government with anarchy is the 2+2=5 statement of all time.) I can't think of one reasonable person who does. At the same time, where does it all end? How much government does an allegedly free people need?







Friday, September 20, 2013

Wrong Winger ?

In this column, I say many things. When it comes to the Kenyan usurper in the White House, I pull no punches. I have no problem calling him a Marxist, a war criminal, a homosexual agenda pusher, a druggie, and a whole host of  nasty things. (Which, as we all know, are perfectly true.) The same goes for his Dhimmicrat and Republican't lackeys in CONgress. I never feel bad about anything I have ever said about these individuals, nor will I ever. After all, along with useless government bureaucrats, Goebbels-inspired propagandists pretending to be journalists, Hollyweird hypocrites, and unwashed liberal drones, these are the lowest forms of life on the planet (which is cooling, might I add).  They deserve to be treated with absolute scorn and ridicule, just like palmetto bugs who decide to use my patio as a home deserve to be squashed.

However, this column is different. In this column, I'm going to go in a direction that is making me downright uncomfortable. I'm going to say a few things I may regret, but they need to be said.

In this column, I'm going to talk about Pope Francis and his comments about homosexuality and abortion.

Now, before we get started, I feel it's necessary to tell you a little bit about myself. Yes, I'm Jewish. However, I didn't grow up in a religious household. Both of my parents were liberal Jews (which, let's face facts, is one short step away from atheism) who volunteered for Jimmuh Carter. (My mother, who is actually South African and Italian, was raised Catholic. She decided she was Jewish when she met my father.) It was my grandfather (my mother's father) who actually gave me real religious guidance. He used to take me to Mass with him, and although I was terrified of the Crucifix at the altar, I actually enjoyed going. I didn't understand what was going on, but going to Mass made me feel good. As I grew older, I felt more in tune with my Jewish heritage, but I will always feel at home in the Catholic Church. It would be an absolutely fair criticism to say that when it comes to religion, I'm having my cake and eating it, too. (Or you could say that I'm a confused heretic doomed to spend eternity in Hell. I can assure you, that thought crosses my mind constantly.)

You see, I'm not angry at what the Holy Father said, that “We cannot insist only on issues related to abortion, gay marriage and the use of contraceptive methods" and “A person once asked me, in a provocative manner, if I approved of homosexuality. I replied with another question: ‘Tell me: when God looks at a gay person, does he endorse the existence of this person with love, or reject and condemn this person?’ We must always consider the person". I'm deeply saddened by it, almost to the verge of clinical depression. One of the cornerstones of Christian thought is to "hate the sin and love the sinner", which is probably the greatest thought man has ever had. In my mind, the Pope has tossed that aside and replaced it with, "tolerate the sin and look the other way". By doing this, not only is he insulting those who stand for traditional values, but he's weakening the Church when the world needs it the most. This isn't to say that the Catholicism is superior of to Protestantism, Judaism, or the Greek Orthodox Church. (Nope, I didn't forget one. I just don't feel like writing about genocidal jihadis today.) I'm looking at the big picture, which is Christianity itself. The world needs a strong Christianity that understands right from wrong, not from a political standpoint (no one is calling for a theocracy) but from a black and white moral standpoint.

Now of course, Jesus did say "let he without sin cast the first stone", and I'm certainly not one who has any business throwing stones at anyone. In my life, I've done my share of sinning, just as you have, too. Nonetheless, I'm fairly certain Jesus never said, "Let he without sin cast the first stone, and you sinners keep on truckin'."






Friday, September 6, 2013

Ummmm.....We're Broke.

For the last couple of days, we've been exposed to an endless stream of war propaganda in support of Chairman Obama's Syrian adventure. Without the slightest bit of mercy, we've been told ad nauseum that it's America's duty to keep the world safe for democracy, we have a responsibility protect, only America can do it, yadda, yadda, yadda by the likes of Bill Kristol, John Kerry, John McCain, and other leftist monsters. In complete defiance of the so-called Godwin Rule, I'd have to say that Joseph Goebbels would be quite envious of the effort of the political hacks trying to push the United States into a world war.


Before we continue, a little housekeeping is in order. I'm a hawk. I fully supported (and still do) the reasons why the United States went to war in Trashcanistan and Iraq. Both were questions of national security. (And let's face the cold, hard truth gang: They were the only things George W. Bush got right, regardless of what Tokyo Rove says.) I'm not a Paultard nor am I a Paleocon isolationist weirdo. I believe the United States has the right to do as it sees fit on the world stage when it comes to national defense and defending our actual allies. (Canada, Great Britain, Israel, and the like. Not death-dealing weasels like the inbreds that run Saudi Arabia, the Arab League, and the Muslim Brotherhood controlled Organization of Islamic Cooperation.)


Now, aside from the moral objection a sane, rational person might have about providing air cover for al-Qaeda's Islamonazi "freedom fighters", (which would obviously be the main reason for opposing this lunacy), we have to look another really big reason for screaming "One, two, three, four, we don't want your fucking war!": The economy of the United States is near collapse. Former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Mike Mullen called the national debt the gravest threat to national security that we face. We are currently $17 trillion in debt, with another $90 trillion in unpaid liabilities. In other words, you could take every penny the Koch brothers have, every drop of oil in the Middle East, every diamond out of South Africa, and every grain of rice grown in China and still not have enough to pay off the national debt. There simply isn't enough wealth on the planet to do that.


I know there are some who say that this is an utterly heartless view. On the contrary, it's a completely humanitarian view. My children should not be on the hook for this idiocy, nor should my grandchildren who are decades away from being born. They had nothing to do this, just as your children and grandchildren had nothing to do with this either. In addition to paying for the failure of Franklin Dictator Roosevelt's New Deal, Lyndon Bum Johnson's Not-So-Great Society, and our Dear Leader's varied scams from the so called Stimulus to Obamacareless, they'll have this on their shoulders, along with the previously mentioned George Bush's blunders like Medicare Part D. The faint chance that our children and grandchildren would have had to lead productive lives without being taxed to death by our ever expanding Federal Leviathan will be swept away for good, especially if this turns into long, protracted war. (Sort of like the ones we're involved in now that no one seems to want to talk about anymore.) When the economy collapses (and at the rate we're going, that will happen sooner rather than later), there will be misery that will make the Great Depression look like Sunday brunch at the Kennedy Compound.


Here's the bottom line, ladies and gentlemen: We're broke. Our so-called leaders, with less economic sense than a meth addict, have spent us into ruin. We can't afford to support a goldfish, let alone fight a civil war for al-Qaeda. We the People should do everything we possibly can to derail this monstrosity.


It's not about us anymore, it's about our children and our grandchildren. We have no right to inflict this on them.










Wednesday, September 4, 2013

Killing For al-Qaeda ? You Betcha!

As we all sit here and wait to find out whether or not the United States will be at war with Assad regime in Syria, I thought now would be as a good a time as any to examine the reason why we're going on this fool's errand that can turn into World War III in a blink of an eye.


No, it has nothing to do with protecting innocents, spreading democracy, or any of the other Progressivik propaganda you have had the misfortune of being exposed to. If that was the case, our Dear Leader would have supported the Green Revolution in Ron Paul's beloved Iran. It has nothing to do with national security, because the former Barry Soetero doesn't believe in national security. If he did, the borders would be locked down, the perpetrators of the Benghazi massacre would be dead, along with Edward Snowden. (For the record, I don't think Snowden is a threat to national security, but King Hussein sure does. He's whined about it enough.) So, right off the bat, we can eliminate the two main reasons why modern presidents use force.


Now, there is the little matter of this being a tactic to draw attention away from the many scandals that are plaguing the Obama Dystopia. That argument would hold water under normal circumstances, but that's not the case here for two reasons. One, Obama knows full well that he'll never be impeached or removed from office as long as the Dims hold the Imperial Senate and the Republicans are led by spineless blobs wet cardboard like Mitch McConman and the helpless Weeper of the House, Johnny Boehner. Two, Obama, despite the accolades heaped upon him by the arrogant and lazy media, isn't clever enough to pull it off. (Bill Caligula he is not.)


So then, what's the reason for this utter madness ?


Treason. Let me say it again: Treason. Let me say it a bunch of times so the NSA can hear me loud and clear: Treason, treason, treason, treason, and oh yes, treason.


You see ladies and gentlemen, we are going to war to save al-Qaeda's revolution in Syria, just as we went to war to save the Muslim Brotherhood's revolution in Libya.


Don't believe me ? Think I'm just an ornery Right Wing cuss with a blog ? Check this out:

***

"Al-Qaeda-linked rebels launched an assault on a regime-held Christian mountain village in the densely populated west of Syria and new clashes erupted near the capital, Damascus, on Wednesday - part of a brutal battle of attrition each side believes it can win despite more than two years of deadlock.


In the attack on the village of Maaloula, rebels commandeered a mountaintop hotel and nearby caves and shelled the community below, said a nun, speaking by phone from a convent in the village. She spoke on condition of anonymity for fear of reprisals."


http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-202_162-57601379/al-qaeda-linked-rebels-assault-syrian-christian-village/


***

Gang, I don't know what to think about any of this. I really don't, and I'm man enough to admit it. A month ago, we were on the edge of complete and total economic, political, and social disaster as a nation. Now, with the Traitor in Chief poised to give al-Qaeda air cover, we're still on the edge of the abyss, but now we're going to lose our souls.


May God have mercy on us.





Wednesday, August 28, 2013

Literally, The Police State Is Coming

In between bowls of chicken poodle soup and deciding to provide air cover for al-Qaeda in Syria, our Dear Leader, Barack Hussein Obama, found time to meet with mayors from our crumbling major cities.


From Justin Sink of The Hill:

***

"President Obama told a collection of big-city mayors Tuesday at the White House that he would continue to use executive actions to combat gun violence plaguing major cities.

In the meeting with Attorney General Eric Holder and the mayors of 18 cities from across the nation, Obama discussed commonly applicable strategies to reduce youth violence.

'He also vowed to continue doing everything in his power to combat gun violence through executive action and to press Congress to pass common-sense reforms like expanding the background check system and cracking down on gun trafficking,' the White House said in a statement."



***

Once you get past the fact that this is the President of the United States talking about violating the Constitution he swore to Allah to uphold, this doesn't seem to be what Joe Bite Me would term a "big f'ing deal". At first glance, the above looks like Barry is just being Barry, pandering to his moonbat base that is getting more and more fed up with the fact that he can't lower the oceans and keep the United States from waging war on behalf of the Muslim Brotherhood.

But of course, that view is criminally negligent. We no longer live in times that allow us to shrug our shoulders and say, "Naah, that could never happen here." We now live in times that force us to say, "I sure as hell hope that ain't true." This a very big "f'ing deal", indeed.

You see, ladies and gentlemen, this meeting, much like the Obamacare meetings, was held behind closed doors. Just like nothing good happens after midnight, nothing good happens when Marxists meet behind closed doors.

Of course, out of this circus of stupidity came the obligatory statement from Obummer that he was going to unilaterally write and enforce his own gun control regulations. Naturally, that was as predictable as Candy Crowley going to town at a buffet. I won't bore you with the details, but let's just say it involves the Federal Leviathan treating the Constitution like old chewing gum on the sole of its jackboot. Basically, King Hussein has decided that his subjects may not purchase imported World War II-era M1 Garand rifles and now the gang members in his adopted hometown of Chicago can't use corporations to buy their "gats". But that can't be the only thing they talked about. The mayors couldn't have possibly flown thousands of miles to clap like overfed seals to hear applause lines that aren't going to do a blessed thing to stop crime.

Perhaps they were discussing this, or a plan like it, all in the name of public safety of course:

***

"An organization representing police chiefs from major cities around the U.S. is promoting an initiative to strengthen intelligence collection at the local level, increasing the integration of state and local law enforcement into the larger structure of the U.S. intelligence community.

In 2011, the Major Cities Chiefs’ Association (MCCA) began the initiative aimed at strengthening domestic intelligence collection efforts and creating a 'more defined, whole-of-government architecture that interconnects and better integrates state and local criminal intelligence and counterterrorism operations.' The Major Cities Chiefs’ Criminal Intelligence Enterprise (CIE) is an effort to create 'better connectivity' between 'state and local counterterrorism and intelligence units and among locally-led operations, fusion centers, and federally-led operations' such as Joint Terrorism Task Forces (JTTFs) and Field Intelligence Groups (FIGs). The initiative is being organized around the  pre-existing infrastructure of the Major Cities Chiefs’ Intelligence Commanders Group (MCCICG), a working group of the MCCA that played a significant role in creating the unified national suspicious activity reporting process."

http://publicintelligence.net/criminal-intelligence-enterprise/


***

Now, for craps and giggles, let's compare the MCCA's police chief roster to the guest list of Commander Zer0's shindig.

Here is the MCCA's American member cities:

***


Atlanta, Georgia
Baltimore, Maryland
Baltimore County, Maryland
Boston, Massachusetts
Buffalo, New York
Charlotte-Mecklenburg, No Carolina
Cincinnati, Ohio
Cleveland, Ohio
Columbus, Ohio
Detroit, Michigan
Fairfax County, Virginia
Greater Manchester, UK
Indianapolis, Indiana
Jacksonville, Florida
Louisville, Kentucky
Miami, FL
Miami-Dade, Florida
Montgomery County, Maryland
Nassau County, New York
New York City, New York
Newark, New Jersey
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Prince George’s Co, Maryland
Raleigh, North Carolina
Suffolk County, New York
Tampa, FL
Virginia Beach, Virginia
Washington D.C.



Arlington, Texas
Austin, Texas
Chicago, Illinois
Dallas, Texas
El Paso, Texas
Fort Worth, Texas
Houston, Texas
Kansas City, Missouri
Memphis, Tennessee
Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Minneapolis, Minnesota
Nashville, Tennessee
New Orleans, Louisiana
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
Omaha, NE
San Antonio, Texas
St. Louis, Missouri
Tulsa, Oklahoma



Albuquerque, New Mexico
Aurora, CO
Denver, Colorado
Fresno, California
Honolulu, Hawaii
Las Vegas, Nevada
Los Angeles County, California
Los Angeles, California
Mesa, Arizona
Oakland, California
Phoenix, Arizona
Portland, Oregon
Sacramento, California
Salt Lake City, Utah
San Diego, California
San Francisco, California
San Jose, California
Seattle, Washington
Tucson, Arizona



https://www.majorcitieschiefs.com/members.php


***

And here's the list of liberal misery pimps that showed up to Chairman Obama's commie ho-down. Every mayor whose chief of police is a member of the MCCA will be marked with a [*]


***


The following mayors attended the meeting:
  • Mayor Greg Ballard (Indianapolis, IN) [*]
  • Mayor Tom Barrett (Milwaukee, WI) [*]
  • Mayor Cory Booker (Newark, NJ)    [*]
  • Mayor Vincent Gray (Washington, DC) [*]
  • Mayor Sly James (Kansas City, MO) [*]
  • Mayor Kevin Johnson (Sacramento, CA) [*]
  • Mayor Mitch Landrieu (New Orleans, LA)[*]
  • Mayor Mark Mallory (Cincinnati, OH) [*]
  • Mayor Michael Nutter (Philadelphia, PA) [*]
  • Mayor Annise Parker (Houston, TX) [*]
  • Mayor Jean Quan (Oakland, CA) [*]
  • Mayor Stephanie Rawlings-Blake (Baltimore, MD) [*]
  • Mayor Kasim Reed (Atlanta, GA) [*]
  • Mayor RT Rybak (Minneapolis, MN) [*]
  • Mayor Francis Slay (St. Louis, MO) [*]
  • Mayor Dayne Walling (Flint, MI)
  • Mayor Molly Ward (Hampton, VA)
  • Mayor AC Wharton (Memphis, TN) [*]

(The list is courtesy of the White House)


 http://www.http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2013/08/27/readout-president-s-meeting-mayors


***

Well, whaddaya know ? 16 of the 18 cities had a police chief that is a member of the MCCA! What a co-winkydink!


Now here's the funny part. The MCCA, in addition to wanting to create its own Mini-Me NSA, wants to slice and dice our Right To Bear Arms.


***

"That’s why we [the MCCA] looked to the U.S. Senate for courage and leadership on gun violence, to enact reforms that are long overdue. With 94 % of the public asking for better gun laws, we expected the Senate to do what cops do–protect the public. But a minority of Senators protected themselves instead of the American people. That’s a disgrace.

A handful of courageous Senators had offered bills to enact modest Federal reforms intended to keep guns out of the hands of criminals and the mentally ill, laws already on the books in many of the States. None of the proposed reforms would have taken guns from anyone and there were no plans for gun registration or licensing. Nothing to threaten those who own guns for recreation, sporting and hunting. But the gun lobby said 'No' to all of it, and when weak Senators caved into the pressure, these common-sense measuresdid not pass. Not one of them......Like all the cops who put on a uniform each day, Chiefs of Police will not give up
on Washington. We will continue our struggle for laws that protect the public from gun violence. Just  as the public knows their police will be there for them, the Chiefs want Americans to know that we are not giving up and going away. This was a week that should forge a new resolve. 
The grief of the Newtown families and spirit of Boston’s citizens and police will not be lost on those of us who are committed to public safety."
***
Hey gang, we're in trouble.....





Tuesday, August 13, 2013

A Snowden Job For The Ages

 Our dog eating Dear Leader, Barack Hussein Obama, had this to say about the "phony" NSA spying scandal during his August 9th "press" conference:


***

"As I said at the National Defense University back in May, in meeting those threats we have to strike the right balance between protecting our security and preserving our freedoms."

http://www.npr.org/2013/08/09/210574114/transcript-president-obamas-news-conference


***


Ladies and gentlemen, the above quote needs to be immortalized in some way. Perhaps it should be carved into the base of the Statue of Liberty or onto the side of a mountain. Maybe children should be forced to memorize it in their union infested government run schools, or better yet, children should be forced to recite it after turning their parents in to Thinkpol.


You see ladies and gentlemen, there isn't a better example than the above quote of what kind of fascist pig Barack Hussein Obama truly is.


In the above quote, the Indonesian raised Obama basically states that the federal government can eat away at our freedom for whatever reason it feels like. Now of course, this isn't news. We the Victims have watched Obama's circus of destruction-like administration wreak havoc on our rights and the Constitution in many, many ways. We've seen Obama unilaterally decide to declare war on Libya, we've seen Obama change Obamacare on a whim several times, we've seen the IRS attempt to silence Conservative dissent, and we've seen the charge to obliterate the Second Amendment and harass journalists, just to name a few crimes against the Republic.


However, this is different.


Now he's claiming the government can shred the Constitution in the name of national security, sort of like, Godwin's Law be darned, Adolf Hitler did when he pushed the Enabling Act through the Reichstag.


Don't get me wrong: I'm all for the War on Terror. I fully support the idea of dispatching Islamonazis to Allah. But let's not kid ourselves. The NSA spying program has absolutely nothing to do with national security. If it did, wouldn't the feds have caught on to Tamerlan Tsarnaev after he made his Islamonazi Youtube page, for example ? Here's another:  How did Edward Snowden walk out of the NSA with four laptops full of classified data and hop on a plane headed to Hong Kong while telling his superiors he was taking time off for the treatment of epilepsy ? These are just a few examples, and I'm sure you come up with quite a few yourself.


The camera (literally and figuratively---take a look around at your nearest intersection.) is pointed at us, not them. Apparently, We the People Who Foot The Bill For All of This are a far greater threat than genocidal Jihadis bent on enslaving the Free World to Shariah Law. (2+2=5 indeed!)


Now that the common sense part of the program is out of the way, here's another question: Where in the heck does the Constitution mention anything about striking "right balance" when comes to any of our rights ? Our rights were given to us by our Creator, not by the federal government, and yes, they are unlimited. Now, I know there will be those who toss out lame examples like "you can't shout 'fire' in a movie theater," or "we have the right to bear arms, but you can't put land mines in your front yard". These arguments are nothing more than the needless slaughter of straw men. The only thing we can't do as a free people is violate the rights of others while exercising our rights. Shouting "fire" in a movie theater isn't illegal in itself, but creating a public disturbance is. We can't have landmines in our yards because they're a danger to the community. (Guns have triggers and require the user to pull them to fire. Regardless of what the libtards would have you believe, guns don't just fire all willy nilly on their own.)


Here's the only "balance" that was recognized by the "old white guys" (aka--The Founders) who wrote the United States Constitution when it comes to being harassed by any level of government:


***

"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."


***

Yep, that's the Fourth Amendment. We the People have the right to live our lives as we see fit and as long as we're not breaking the law or violating the rights of others. Owning a telephone or surfing the internet doesn't create the probable cause described in the Fourth Amendment. Neither does being at war. Actually doing something creates probable cause. For example, calling Taliban held territory in Afghanistan on a regular basis creates probable cause. My wife calling me to demand that I bring home milk does not create probable cause. (And not for nothing, Islamonazi terrorists don't use the internet or cell phones to communicate. They, like the mob, use couriers, kind of like the one that was followed to track down Osama Bin Laden.)


The bottom line is this: We're on the edge of complete economic, political, and social disaster. The Snowden Job shows just how close we are to that edge.





















Tuesday, August 6, 2013

Why Should I Vote GOP ?

As a Conservative, I hold these truths to be self evident, in no particular order:

  • Life begins at the moment of conception. Abortion, for any reason real or imagined, is murder.
  • The Right to Bear Arms is an unalienable right that the government cannot infringe on in any way. Background checks, "assault weapon" bans, magazine capacity rules, and the like are completely unconstitutional.
  • Global warming is as much of a fraud as the "Next Ice Age" scare of the 1970's.
  • Illegal aliens are criminals and should be treated as such. There should be no amnesty for illegal aliens whatsoever. All illegal aliens should be deported without exception.
  • The Constitution should be interpreted exactly as it's written without exception.
  • Marriage is between a man and a woman only.
  • Capitalism is the only economic system that works.
  • Radical Islam is just as dangerous as the Axis Powers and the Soviet Union.


 Basic stuff, right ?


For We the Conservatives, absolutely. This is our meat and drink. This is who we are. The above self evident truths are in our souls. The vast majority of us are not willing to compromise one iota on any of them for a variety of heartfelt reasons. (Memo to arrogant and lazy media: Yeah, yeah, it's because we're all a bunch of racists, blah, blah, blah. Got it.)

So here's the Hundred Trillion Dollar Question: Why do we, as Conservatives, keep voting for the Sit-Down-When-They-G-O-Pee ? (Say it fast, you'll get it.)

For every truth I've listed above, there is a Republican, either in political office or as a useless talking head doing their best to fight against them. The laughable Mitt Trotsky was all for abortion as long as the "mother's life was in danger". TEA Party traitor Pat Toomey allied himself with the radical far left and tried to obliterate the Second Amendment. During the 2008 Popularity Contest, court jester John McLame made cap and trade part of his platform. Marco Rubio and Paul Ryan have decided that illegal alien criminals should be granted amnesty. John McLame (like a bad penny, isn't he ?) teamed up with Pus Feingold and declared war on the First Amendment. Michele Bachmann thinks it's Constitutional and perfectly A-OK to have the NSA spy on American citizens. Rob Portman and Ileana Ros-Lethinen are cheering for homosexual "marriage". Tokyo Rove and Charles Krauthammer are doing their level headed best to make sure that the socialist scam known as Obamacareless is funded. The rotund Chris Christie has never met an Islamonazi that he didn't want to make a judge. I could go on and on about the Weeper of the House and Mitch McConman, but this paragraph is long enough and depressing enough already.


I'm not exactly sold on the idea of a third party, but I'm becoming more and more open to it every day. Sure, there are some rock solid Conservatives in the party and in the media (Mike Lee, Rand Paul, Louie Gohmert, Sarah Palin, Mark Levin, and Rush Limbaugh to name a few), but let's face it, they are becoming marginalized in today's Sit-Down-When-They-G-O-Pee. They're derided as "hobbits" and relegated to the nether regions of the party, despite the fact that the vast majority of the base agrees with them. As their influence wanes, so does our liberty. I don't have all the answers and I'm not going to pretend that I do, but I at least know what question to ask:


Why should I vote GOP ?





Saturday, June 29, 2013

How To Win Elections

In the days after the whimpering defeat of Mitt Trotsky, the RINO National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus (whoever the hell he is) did an "autopsy" on the Republican Party. In this "autopsy", it was determined that the Republican Party needed a "bigger tent". The gist of the report was this: The party was too white, too Christian, and too male. The only way to get out of the loser's bracket was to pander to as many minorities as possible.

 In the soon to be immortal words of Alan Levy: What a steaming pile of camel Shi'ite.


You see ladies and gentlemen, regardless of what the hapless Bill Kristol will tell you, regardless of  the non-stop propaganda of Tokyo Rove and his acolytes at the FOX Neocon Channel (FNC), pandering to artificial ethnic and social groups will get you nowhere. What leads political parties out of the wilderness is doing what your base wants. After all, a party's base is its engine.

There are two great examples of  the above theory. The French Revolution of 2008 that swept the Authoritarian Left and their false messiah, Barack Hussein Obama, into power and the American Revolution of 2010 that brought a degree of Conservatism back to Washington. (Where it was promptly sabotaged by the Weeper of the House and his cronies, but I digress.)

In both examples, the parties gave the base what they wanted. In 2008, the Democrat Party's base shed its last vestiges of Americanism. The libs wanted fascism and Big Brother controlling every aspect of human existence in the United States. Thus, the party responded by handing them the former Barry Soetoro and the drunken Joe Biteme. In 2010, the RNC got the hint and didn't severely persecute Tea Party candidates, despite pleas from Tokyo Rove and his ilk. Thus, the 2010 midterm elections turned into a massacre as the independents and Reagan Democrats came home.

But in 2012, things went back to normal for the Republicans. The party's Conservative grassroot activists were treated like Orwellian unpersons again. Mitt Trotsky and his putrid record as the governor of Taxachussetts were trotted out like a  prized dancing horse by the RINO Herd as the Great White Hope. Tea Party and Conservative candidates were treated like pariahs with leprosy and were openly opposed by the usual suspects (Rove, Kristol, Sheikh Ali Paul and the Paulestinians) and were defeated as the base blew off the 2012 Popularity Contest and stayed home.

In 2012 however, the Democrat Party stayed the course. They knew that keeping base happy is the key to victory. Thus, they invented the "war on women", gathered as many dead voters as they could, and screamed that the Republican Party was the latest incarnation of the Third Reich. Sure, they couldn't trot out Obama as the guy who would lower the oceans and heal the earth anymore, but that was no longer the goal. DNC chair Debbie Blabbermouth Schultz and her fellow Jew haters realized that there was no way on God's green and cooling earth that they could make the American people Hussein in the Membrane anymore. They also realized that the usual election rigging wouldn't carry them over the goal line either, no matter how many members of the US military were disenfranchised and how many fake talking points about the 9/11/12 attack in Benghazi were thrown out to the lazy and arrogant media. Thus they doubled down on their Marxist propaganda and dragged Obama's carcass across the finish line.

Now let's return from our stroll down Memory Hole Lane. The Democrat Party is still goosestepping to beat of the same Hitlerjugend drummer. They're still screaming for social "justice", demanding that homosexuals have the right to "marry", no one should have the right to bear arms, illegal alien criminals are better than native born Americans, and all of the rest of the anti-American crap that they've been babbling about ever since the first Progressiviks crawled out primordial soup of failed European political theory in the early 20th century. Thus, the base is happy, no matter how much the NSA spies on them.

And what's the Republican Party doing ?  It's doing what it does best: Stabbing its Conservative base in the back.

As a rule, the vast majority of Conservatives are vehemently opposed  homosexual "marriage", gun control, amnesty for illegal alien criminals, raising taxes, and all the rest. And yet, the Republican Party's glitterati supports these and many other leftist ideals. Marco Rubio and Paul Ryan are leading the charge to grant amnesty to the scumbags who spit on American sovereignty and hopped over the virtual fence. Rob Portman and Ileana Ros Lethinen think destroying the institution of marriage is the way to go. Tea Party traitor Pat Toomey joined up with the National Socialist Left and decided that the Second Amendment no longer applies in the United States. John McLame and Lindsey Grahamnesty weren't content with just opening the door wide open to illegal aliens and whatever else comes across the southern border, the Same Sex Senators (h/t Mark Levin) were instrumental in making sure Chairman Obama armed al-Qaeda in Syria. Oh, by the way, in case you forgot, the Weeper of the House folded his tent and failed to fight against Obama's tax hike in January.

I'd be hard pressed to call that pandering to the base, wouldn't you ? I'd also be hard pressed to call this a winning strategy.









Friday, June 28, 2013

Not Celebrating This Year

This year, I am not celebrating the Fourth of July. I won't be firing off any fireworks. I won't be torching the family's hamburgers and hot dogs like I do every year. Who knows, I might even be sober all day.


In short, I am turning the Fourth of July into the fourth of July.


To be perfectly blunt and honest, I don't feel We the People have a whole lot to celebrate anymore. I know how that sounds, and I wish to God I felt differently, but I don't. Everywhere we look, a little more of our precious freedom is being taken away.  There are cameras at every intersection. The IRS is trampling all over the First Amendment, as is Obamacareless. The movement to eradicate the Second Amendment is obviously not dead, and oh yes, before I forget, the NSA is keeping tabs on what I Google and to whom I speak to.

If there was a glimmer of hope, I'm sure I'd feel differently. But if you haven't noticed, there's no light at the end of the tunnel. The Republican Panty (no typo) hasn't done a blessed thing to stop any of the above crimes against the Republic. When America was crying out for a Reagan-esque Conservative during the 2012 Popularity Contest, the Republican Panty gave us the hapless Mitt Trotsky. Instead of fighting to the bitter end on homosexual "marriage", "Republicans" (Rob Portman and Ileana Ros Lethinen) joined forces with the Anti-God Left. When the Democrat Party wanted to cash in on the Sandy Hook tragedy and grab our guns, "Republican" Pat Toomey helped to lead the charge. In case that doesn't make your insides shake, the Same Sex Senators (h/t Mark Levin), Lindsey Grahamnesty and John McLame are demanding that the United States arm al-Qaeda in Syria. And finally, there's Benedict Rubio, trading our national sovereignty for a smattering of praise from the New York Slimes and the Washington Compost. Needless to say, Republican resistance to Chairman Obama's plots and schemes have been tepid at best and willing collaboration at worst.

I don't know about you, but none of this makes me want to pack the wife, the dog, and my 2.4 kids into my gas-guzzling SUV and head to the seashore.

Now, please understand. I'm not trying to start a movement. I'm not telling you not to celebrate the Fourth. And to be sure, I'll understand if you want to call me an asshole. My attitude sucks and I am more than willing to admit it. If you have any ideas how drag us from the edge of complete economic, political, and social disaster, please let me know.

I don't know if I can take this depression anymore....




 

Tuesday, May 21, 2013

Let's Talk About The Islamonazis In Our Government

At the risk of being investigated by the by the Gestap---er,uh---, Infernal Revenue "Service" (no typo), I bid you greetings, fellow patriots. Just for fun and an undying thirst for the truth, let's talk about the infiltration of of radical Islamonazis of the State Of Confusion Department under Hitlery Clinton, friend of the PLO and Hamas.


Now before we get started, a little housekeeping is in order. I am not a conspiracy theorist. I'm not an Alex Jones groupie. I'm not a Paultard who blames Mossad or the CIA for 9/11/01 between bong hits. I'm simply an observant person who uses his head for more than a hat rack. I am simply asking questions that the arrogant and lazy media refuses to ask, no matter how much Eric Holder's Orwellian Department of Justice harasses them.


I'd like you to meet two very important people.The first is Farah Andwar Pandith, the second is Rashad Hussain, both high on the State of Confusion Department's food chain.


Let's start with Farah Andwar Pandith, the Statist Department's "Special Representative to Muslim Communities". Here's her official bio on the State Department's website, with emphasis and comments within [brackets] where appropriate.

***

"Farah Pandith was appointed the first-ever Special Representative to Muslim Communities in June 2009 by then-Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton. [without any oversight from CONgress.] Under the leadership of Secretary John Kerry, the Office of the Special Representative continues to be responsible for executing a vision for engagement with Muslims around the world based on a people-to-people and organizational level . [Is it me, or does that sound like 'community organizing' ? But I digress...] In the years since her swearing in, Special Representative Pandith has traveled to more than 80 countries and launched youth-focused initiatives including Generation Change, Viral Peace and Hours Against Hate (a campaign that was a partner with the London 2012 Olympic and Paralympic Games.) She is also a key architect of the Women in Public Service Project. In January 2013 she was awarded the Secretary's Distinguished Honor Award which is given for 'exceptionally outstanding service to the agencies of the U.S. Government resulting in achievements of marked national or international significance.' She reports directly to the Secretary of State.

Prior to this appointment, she was Senior Advisor to the Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs. In this role she was focused on Muslim communities in Europe where she was responsible for policy oversight for integration, democracy, and Islam in the Bureau of European and Eurasian Affairs. She also worked on issues relating to countering violent Islamic extremism. She served as the Director for Middle East Regional Initiatives for the National Security Council from December 2004 to February 2007, where she was responsible for coordinating U.S. policy on 'Muslim World' Outreach and the Broader Middle East North Africa initiative. She reported directly to the Deputy Assistant to the President and Deputy National Security Advisor for Global Democracy Strategy.

Prior to joining the NSC, Special Representative Pandith was Chief of Staff for the Bureau for Asia and the Near East for the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID). She worked directly for the Assistant Administrator for the bureau responsible for more than $4 billion in programs throughout the Middle East, South Asia, and Asia -- including Iraq, Afghanistan and Gaza/West Bank. In 2004, she spent two months in Kabul, Afghanistan. From 1997 to 2003 Special Representative Pandith was Vice President of International Business for ML Strategies in Boston, Massachusetts. Special Representative Pandith also served as the Special Assistant to the Director of Policy at USAID and has been a consultant in both the public, private and non-profit sectors. She has served in leadership positions on several boards with a focus on international affairs and is a Member of the Council on Foreign Relations.

Special Representative Pandith received a Master’s degree from The Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University, where she specialized in International Security Studies, Islamic Civilizations and Southwest Asia, and International Negotiation and Conflict Resolution. She concentrated on the insurgency in Kashmir and has spoken on the subject in international and domestic forums. She received an A.B. in Government and Psychology from Smith College, where she was president of the student body. She has served as a Trustee of Smith College and Milton Academy and is currently a member of the Board of Overseers of The Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy. She was born in Srinagar, Kashmir, India. "

http://www.state.gov/r/pa/ei/biog/125492.htm


***

Yeah, I know. I'm a bigot, an Islamophobe, blah, blah, blah, yadda, yadda, yadda. Got it. But let's put Ms. Pandith under the microscope anyway. Let's ask a question that may not be pleasant to ask, but must be asked. Why is an individual who hails from one of the hot beads of Islamic terrorism (the Kashmir area of India) helping to dole out the hard earned money of the American taxpayer to other hot beds of terrorism, like Gaza, West bank, Afghanistan, and Iraq ?

Again, (and this bears worth repeating), I know how this sounds. However, this is highly irregular, and that needs to be said. At the risk of being flogged for violating Godwin's Law, this would be like having an individual who was born in Munich working in a department of the US government helping to fund the Third Reich's "Strength Through Joy" program during World War II. It simply makes no sense.

Oh, and not for nothing, there have been a few problems with USAID. Here's one such problem, from back in 2004, when Pandith was still involved:



***


"Despite its policy to cut off funding to terrorists, the U.S. continues to finance promotion and glorification of Islamic 'martyrdom,' according to a report submitted to members of Congress.

In a recent example, nearly $500,000 of USAID [United States Agency for International Development] money funded a Palestinian Authority soccer stadium named after the head of Black September terrorists, says Itamar Marcus, author of the report.

The group was responsible for the murder of two Americans diplomats in Sudan and 11 Israeli athletes at the 1972 Munich Olympics."




***

Pretty wild, huh ? But yet, no one in CONgress wants Inner Party Member Pandith to appear before a committee. No one in the arrogant and lazy media wants to run any specials on her, either. Just another faceless bureaucrat pushing the dagger deeper and deeper into the back of America and no one seems to notice or care.


As nightmarish as the above is, this guy takes the cake. Ladies and gentlemen (and whatever the hell Rachel Maddcow is), I present to you Rashad Hussain, the "Special Envoy to the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC)".


***


"WASHINGTON - Today, President Obama appointed Rashad Hussain to serve as his Special Envoy to the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC). Comprised of over 50 member states, the OIC is the second largest inter-governmental organization in the world. As Special Envoy to the OIC, Rashad Hussain will deepen and expand the partnerships that the United States has pursued with Muslims around the world since President Obama's speech in Cairo last June.

President Fuhrer Obama said, 'I’m proud to announce today that I am appointing my Special Envoy to the OIC—Rashad Hussain. As an accomplished lawyer and a close and trusted member of my White House staff, Rashad has played a key role in developing the partnerships I called for in Cairo. And as a hafiz of the Qur’an, he is a respected member of the American Muslim community, and I thank him for carrying forward this important work.' "


http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/president-obama-announces-special-envoy-organization-islamic-conference


***

Well, that doesn't say a whole lot. That's kinda like watching  Jay Carney demonstrate the proper care of one's eyebrows.  Who is Rashad Hussain  and what is the OIC ?

Hmmm....It's pretty apparent that we won't get any answers out of our "transparent"government. Let's try some different sources, shall we ? Hopefully, they're still out there. As we all know, the Obama Regime and their stormtroopers in the Infernal Revenue Service don't consider dissent patriotic in way, shape, or form, nor do they consider it legal.


Here goes nothing....

***

"The son of Indian-born U.S. citizens, Rashad Hussain was born in Wyoming in 1978 and was raised in Plano, Texas. He holds a bachelor’s degree in philosophy and political science from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, a master's degree in Arabic & Islamic studies from Harvard University, and a J.D. from Yale Law School. In the summer of 2000, he served as an intern in the office of Democratic congressman Richard Gephardt.

In October 2000, Hussain spoke at a conference sponsored by the Association of Muslim Social Scientists and Georgetown University's Prince Alwaleed Center for Muslim-Christian Understanding. Titled 'Islam, Pluralism, and Demoracy,' this gathering featured appearances by numerous leaders of the global Muslim Brotherhood, including such notables as Louay Safi, Jamal Barzinji, Hisham Al-Talib, and AbdulHamid AbuSulayman.

In June 2002, Hussain participated in a Congressional Staffers panel at the American Muslim Council’s (AMC) 11th annual convention. At that time, AMC was headed by the Muslim Brotherhood leader Abdurahman Alamoudi, who would later be convicted and incarcerated on terrorism charges.

In 2003 Hussain was a recipient of the Paul & Daisy Soros Fellowship for New Americans, which was founded by, and named after, George Soros's older brother and sister-in-law."




http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/individualProfile.asp?indid=2563




***



Isn't that adorable ? But wait, this gets better. In August 2008, Hussain (with co-author Al-Husein N. Madhany) wrote this for the waaaay left of center Brookings Institution (Emphasis will be added where necessary and smart alecky comments from yours truly will be in [brackets].)


***

"The global effort to end terrorism must be more effective in utilizing its strongest ally: Islam. There
is nothing more persuasive to Muslims than Islam. If the global coalition to stop Al-Qaeda and other terrorists groups is to succeed, it must convince potential terrorists that Islam requires them to reject
terrorism. As a part of this effort, we recommend the following:


First, policymakers should redefine the battle of ideas as a battle between terrorist elements in the
Muslim world and Islam. Muslims worldwide support the general concepts of freedom and democracy,
and democratic reforms may provide a peaceful means of addressing political grievances. But given the Muslim world’s skeptical attitudes toward American democracy and freedom promotion, framing the battle of ideas as a battle between terrorism and freedom is no longer productive.


Second, policymakers should reject the use of language that provides a religious legitimization of
terrorism such as 'Islamic terrorism' and'“Islamic extremist.' They should replace such terminology
with more specific and descriptive terms such as 'Al-Qaeda terrorism.' Tweaking the rhetoric of the
war on terrorism is a simple step that can help delegitimize terrorists, earn the trust of the Muslim
world, and increase the precision with which we describe and address terrorism.
[I have the strangest feeling of deja vu. I feel like we've heard this crap before, most notably from our Kenyan Overlord.]


Third, the United States should seek to build a broad and diverse coalition of partners, not limited to
those who advocate Western-style democracy, and avoid creating a dichotomy between freedom and
Islamic society. Such a coalition should incorporate those who may have political differences, so long as
they reject terrorism. Creating such a coalition, one that might even be led by Muslim nations, will help
eliminate the perception that global counterterrorism efforts are anti-Islamic and are simply a mask
for promotion of Western values.
[This is key and will make more sense when we discuss the OIC.]


Fourth, the United States should enlist the assistance of scholars of Islam and of the Muslim world
to determine how best to frame the mission of the global counterterrorism coalition. Rather than
framing the conflict as 'pro-freedom' or 'anti-Jihadist,' these scholars should analyze the most persuasive
methods for applying Islamic law to reject terrorism. [How do you say "LOL" in Arabic ?]

Fifth, the United States should incorporate the Muslim community as well as scholars of Islam and of the Muslim world in the policy making process to help craft policies that reflect a more nuanced understanding of those targeted. The use of such experts is necessary to ensure that policy reflects an understanding of complex theological and political nuances of the Muslim world and avoids the dangerous pitfalls of generalization and oversimplification. [Keep this in mind, too.]

Sixth, the United States should promote and distribute scholarship such as the Amman Message and the
North American Muslims Scholars’ Fatwa Against Terrorism which carefully analyze issues such as
the use of force in Islam and concludes that terrorism must be rejected unequivocally. It is precisely these
types of religious rulings—which by design receive the broadest possible support from Muslim leadership
representing nearly all Muslims —that will prove most effective in countering terrorists that mis-characterize
Islam in advancing their agendas.


Seventh, recognizing the benefit of strengthening the authoritative voices of mainstream Islam, the U.S. should welcome and encourage the further development of mainstream Muslim organizations and moderate institutions such as religious seminaries. [Betcha 100 trillion fiat dollars that the criminal front group known as the ACLU wouldn't have the slightest problem with this. For that matter, neither would the frauds at the Southern Poverty Law Center, nor would Abe Foxman's All Democrats League (ADL). But I digress.]


Finally, as the Esposito-Mogahed study’s Gallup data found, 'the primary cause of broad-based anger
and anti-Americanism is not a clash of civilizations but the perceived effect of U.S. foreign policy in the
Muslim world.' While an examination of political and economic problems that are frequently cited as
major grievances not just of terrorists but also of large populations of Muslims around the world is
beyond the scope of this paper, the U.S. should continue to promote effective economic and social
reforms and to work with allies in crafting fair and peaceful resolutions to conflicts in the Middle East
and in other parts of the Muslim world.'  [In other words, Israel must be wiped off the map and the American tax payer needs to cough up billions every year.]

 http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/research/files/papers/2008/8/counterterrorism%20hussain/08_counterterrorism_hussain.pdf


***

I know this is a lot to take in all at once. Take a small break. Get yourself a drink, walk the dog, or whatever. I'll just wait here...


Oh, good you're back! I know you feel like an artery is going to open up your head, but I can assure you that this is important.


Exactly what is the Organization of Islamic Cooperation ? The easiest answer I can up with is this: Imagine Media Matters' head honcho David Brock putting on his hot pink burqa and demanding jihad against Zionists and Conservatives. Basically, it's an organization that builds a bridge that links the radical left and the Islamonazis. In other words, it's jihadi tyranny with more than a hint of leftism. It is the second largest coalition of sovereign countries, with only the hated UN being larger. If one really wanted to bring back the Caliphate, the OIC would be a great foundation, regardless of what ostriches like the hapless Bill Kristol claim to think or believe.

Let's look at a bit of the eyebrow raising stuff in the OIC's charter (Insert your favorite Jay Carney joke here):


***

"to support the struggle of the Palestinian people, who are presently under foreign occupation, and to empower them to attain their inalienable rights, including the right to self-determination, and to establish their sovereign state with Al-Quds Al-Sharif as its capital, while safeguarding its historic and Islamic character, and the holy places therein;"  


 http://www.oic-oci.org/page_detail.asp?p_id=53


***

 Gee, that sounds a whole lot like Hamas.


Speaking of  Hamas, there's something very, very interesting in their charter. Take a look see:


***

"The Islamic Resistance Movement is one of the wings of Muslim Brotherhood in Palestine. Muslim Brotherhood Movement is a universal organization which constitutes the largest Islamic movement in modern times. It is characterised by its deep understanding, accurate comprehension and its complete embrace of all Islamic concepts of all aspects of life, culture, creed, politics, economics, education, society, justice and judgement, the spreading of Islam, education, art, information, science of the occult and conversion to Islam."


 http://avalon.law.yale.edu/20th_century/hamas.asp


***

How does this relate to the to the OIC and Rashad Hussain, you ask ? That's easily explained by this:


***


"President Mohamed Morsi inaugurated on Wednesday 6/2/2013 the 12th Summit of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC).

The summit is attended by 27 leaders of Islamic countries amid tight security around the venue of the summit.
The President delivered the opening speech that was followed by the speech of the Senegalese President, in his capacity as the president of the 11th OIC Summit.

Following Egypt's speech, OIC Secretary General Dr. Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu and leaders of African, Asian, Arab groups deliver their speeches.

In the afternoon, the first session will be held during which the summit agenda will be approved.
Morsi received on Tuesday 5/2/2013 President Abdullah Gul of Turkey, President Omar Guelleh of Djibouti and President Idriss Deby of Chad and their accompanying delegations."

http://allafrica.com/stories/201302061220.html


***

What a co-winky-dink! Egypt just happens to be run by the Muslim Brotherhood! 

(I guess now would be as good a time as any to remind everyone and their grandmother that in addition to helping to create Hamas, the Muslim Brotherhood also gave birth to a group that you may of heard of called al-Qaeda.)


Like I stated earlier, the OIC and the radical left in the US and Europe are comrades to the end. For example, like Commander Zer0  and his thugs at the Infernal Revenue Service, the OIC does not like Free Speech, or Freedom of Religion.

Take a gander at this:

***

"Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu, secretary-general of the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC), said the international community should 'come out of hiding from behind the excuse of freedom of expression', a reference to Western arguments against a universal blasphemy law that the OIC has sought for over a decade.


He said the 'deliberate, motivated and systematic abuse of this freedom' were a danger to global security and stability.

Separately, the Human Rights Commission of the OIC, which has 57 members and is based in Saudi Arabia, said 'growing intolerance towards Muslims' had to be checked and called for 'an international code of conduct for media and social media to disallow the dissemination of incitement material.' "



http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/09/19/us-protests-religions-blasphemy-idUSBRE88I1EG20120919


***

And of course, for those not faint of heart:


***

"The 56-member Organization of Islamic Conference, the largest Muslim organization in the world, should have a seat on the UN Security Council, said Prof. Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu, its secretary-general.

'One of the important objectives for which I have been exerting a lot of efforts was to have a seat for OIC in the Security Council to represent 1.5 billion Muslims in the world,' Ihsanoglu told reporters in Cairo.
Speaking about the challenges facing the Islamic Ummah, he said they include poverty, lack of economic integration, Jewish settlement in occupied Arab territories, and Judaization of Jerusalem (Al-Quds)."


http://www.arabnews.com/saudi-arabia/oic-demands-seat-top-un-body-represent-muslims


***

Now, I know someone from the United States federal government should be keeping an eye on the OIC, but that someone shouldn't be Rashad Hussain, who apparently agrees with them. That someone should be a CIA agent with a whole lot of backup.


Hello ? Peter King ? Are you out there, Pete ? Hello ? Darrell Issa ?  Darrell ? Republican Party ? Hello, anyone home ? Someone, please speak up. These crickets are really, really annoying.


The bottom line is this gang: We're in massive, massive trouble as a nation. I dare say we're on the edge of complete economic, political, and social disaster. I can't make it any more clear than that. I also don't have a solution of what could or should be done, since it's pretty obvious that our bloated leviathan of a government considers political correctness more important than national security.


PS--- They still want your guns. Have a great day.