There's a lot I despise Chairman Obama for. He's a communist. He pushes the homosexual agenda with reckless abandon. He hates Jews. He persecutes Catholics. He's a pathological liar. And oh, yes, before I forget, he's a racist with a burning hatred for whites. In short, he's a bleeding hemorrhoid on the ass of humanity.
The funny thing about all of the above is the fact that they are not his worst qualities. Obama proves on a daily basis that there are sewers that he's not to proud to hunt for food in. And the following proves it.
From Politico :
***
“ 'The majority of those who died today were children, beautiful little
kids between the ages of 5 and 10 years old,' Obama said, bowing his
head as he collected his emotions. No sound was audible in the James S.
Brady briefing room, named for the Reagan press secretary grievously
wounded by a would-be assassin, but the clicking of cameras captured a
rare presidential tear.
Saturday, December 15, 2012
Sunday, December 9, 2012
Ummm...What's ILAB ? OIR ?
So tell me, patriot, have you ever heard of ILAB ?
Nope. Do they fix iphones ?
Well, not exactly. ILAB is yet another dangerous Marxist-style agency in our bloated Federal Leviathan that almost no one has ever heard of. ILAB is an acronym for "Bureau of International Affairs" and is a sub-bureaucracy of the Department of Labor. It's stated mission is this:
***
"The Bureau of International Labor Affairs (ILAB) leads the U.S. Department of Labor’s efforts to ensure that workers around the world are treated fairly and are able to share in the benefits of the global economy. ILAB’s mission is to use all available international channels to improve working conditions, raise living standards, protect workers’ ability to exercise their rights, and address the workplace exploitation of children and other vulnerable populations."
http://www.dol.gov/ilab/mission.htm#.UMS2q1KrFQw
***
Hey, that doesn't sound too good.
Yep. That's as commie pinko as it sounds.
Oh, but this gets better. Oh, so much better.
ILAB has its own sub-bureaucracy, the Office of International Relations, or OIR. What does the OIR do ?
I'm not going to like this, am I ?
Nope.
***
"The Office of International Relations represents or facilitates representation of the U.S. Government in the International Labor Organization (ILO) and the labor components of international organizations; provides expertise, research and advice on labor and employment trends and issues in foreign countries; and helps facilitate the sharing of information between specialized DOL agencies and other countries. The ILO is the primary labor standard setting and monitoring organization in the world."
http://www.dol.gov/ILAB/programs/oir/#.UMS5zVKrFQw
***
I---we---Can they---
Don't get all wobbly on me now, patriot! There's more! Guess who runs the ILO ?
***
"The International Labour Organization (ILO) is the only tripartite U.N. agency with government, employer, and worker representatives. This tripartite structure makes the ILO a unique forum in which the governments and the social partners of the economy of its 185 Member States can freely and openly debate and elaborate labour standards and policies."
http://www.ilo.org/global/about-the-ilo/who-we-are/lang--en/index.htm
***
What does this mean for everyday folks like us ?
It means more of our money is redistributed to folks in the Third World who deserve it way more than we who earned it. For example:
***
"DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Bureau of International Labor Affairs
Project to Strengthen Worker Organizations in Haiti and Peru
ANNOUNCEMENT TYPE: New. Notice of Availability of Funds and Solicitation for
Cooperative Agreement Applications.
FUNDING OPPORTUNITY NUMBER: SGA 12-17
CATALOG OF FEDERAL DOMESTIC ASSISTANCE (CFDA) NUMBER: Not
applicable.
KEY DATES: Issuance Date: October 9, 2012 Closing Date: November 15, 2012 Closing Time: 5:00 PM EST Deadline for Submission of Technical Questions: October 18, 2012 Date of Award: No later than December 31, 2012
TOTAL FUNDING AVAILABLE FOR AWARD: $2.2 million.
NUMBER AND TYPES OF ANTICIPATED FUNDING AWARDS: One or more
cooperative agreements.
ELIGIBLE APPLICANTS: Any commercial, international, educational, or non-profit
organization(s), including any faith-based, community-based, or public international
organization(s) capable of successfully building the capacity of worker organizations in Haiti
and/or Peru.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Labor (USDOL), Bureau of
International Labor Affairs (ILAB) announces its intent to award up to $2.2 million for one or
more cooperative agreements to one or more organizations in order to strengthen
independent, democratic worker organizations in Haiti and Peru. The duration of the projects
funded by this solicitation can be up to four years and six months. The start date of program
activities will be negotiated upon award of an individual cooperative agreement, but will be
no later than December 31, 2012.
Applications will be accepted via electronic submission to www.grants.gov or by hardcopy
(to include electronic copy/CD) hand delivered or mailed to the Grant Officer at the
following address:
USDOL/Office of Procurement Services
Attn: Brenda White, Grant Officer
200 Constitution Avenue NW, Room S-4307
Washington, DC 20210
Reference: SGA 12-17
AGENCY CONTACTS:
Primary: Brenda J. White, Grant Officer Alternate: James Kinslow, Grant Officer"
http://www.dol.gov/ilab/grants/SGA12-17.pdf
***
In other words, we have our own Obamunintern. Forward, indeed.
Ladies and gentlemen, I'm fully aware that this wouldn't even be a drop in the bucket when it comes to spending by the Federal Leviathan. After all, our dog eating Homosexual Agenda Pusher in Chief, Barack Hussein Obama, spends $2.2 mil before he grabs his golf bag in the afternoon. Defunding ILAB or the OIR won't bring us to some sort of of Right Wing Utopia. I get that.
But at the same time, we can't ignore things like this, either. The federal government is now using tax dollars to spread Marxist propaganda by using unaccountable, unconstitutional bureaucracies Take a moment and let that sink in. This is as sinister as it gets. If you need further proof, take a gander who's running the show at ILAB:
***
"Carol Pier was sworn in as the Associate Deputy Undersecretary for International Affairs at the Department of Labor on August 24, 2009. In that capacity, she assists the Deputy Undersecretary in carrying out her responsibilities.
For ten years prior to her appointment, Ms. Pier worked on labor rights and trade issues for Human Rights Watch, the largest U.S.-based non-governmental organization dedicated to promoting and protecting human rights. She documented and reported on workers' rights violations around the world, analyzed foreign and domestic labor laws, and engaged in advocacy on labor rights and trade matters in the United States and abroad.
Ms. Pier is a graduate of Harvard Law School and holds a B.A. from the University of Notre Dame."
http://www.dol.gov/ilab/leadership.htm#.UMUwmVKrFQw
***
Hmmm..."Human Rights Watch".....Why does that word make the hairs on the back of my neck stand at the position of attention ? Oh wait, now I remember! This is why:
***
"While professing neutrality in matters of war and peace, [Human Rights Watch] has been a staunch foe of the American-led war on terror. The organization was a signatory to a November 1, 2001 document characterizing the 9/11 attacks as a legal matter to be addressed by criminal-justice procedures rather than military means. Ascribing the hijackers’ motives to alleged social injustices against which they were protesting, this document explained that 'security and justice are mutually reinforcing goals that ultimately depend upon the promotion of all human rights for all people,' and called on the United States 'to promote fundamental rights around the world.' Similarly, in 2002 HRW claimed that the United States and its coalition allies 'have substituted expediency for the firm commitment to human rights that alone can defeat the rationale of terrorism.' Moreover, HRW warned that 'the coalition risks reinforcing the logic of terrorism unless human rights are given a far more central role.' That is, unless coalition forces followed HRW’s distinctive definition of human rights, they were only reinforcing the 'view that anything goes in the name of a cause.' "
http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/groupProfile.asp?grpid=6258
***
And guess who helps fund Human Rights Watch ? C'mon...take a guess,,,,
***
"In accepting a huge grant [$100 million] from George Soros, Human Rights Watch has spurned the public advice (and warning) offered nearly a year ago by its founder Robert Bernstein. Rather than grapple with the serious problems of credibility and bias, HRW Executive Director Kenneth Roth has cemented relations with Soros -- a partisan ideologue who also supports Moveon.org, a controversial advocacy group."
http://www.nypost.com/p/news/opinion/opedcolumnists/selling_out_to_soros_iYfn7YXaZg8xEFCp5iEcCJ
***
We're on the edge of complete political, economic, and social disaster. I can't gussy it up. I can't make it sound palatable. It is what it is. The end is nigh, God help us all.
Nope. Do they fix iphones ?
Well, not exactly. ILAB is yet another dangerous Marxist-style agency in our bloated Federal Leviathan that almost no one has ever heard of. ILAB is an acronym for "Bureau of International Affairs" and is a sub-bureaucracy of the Department of Labor. It's stated mission is this:
***
"The Bureau of International Labor Affairs (ILAB) leads the U.S. Department of Labor’s efforts to ensure that workers around the world are treated fairly and are able to share in the benefits of the global economy. ILAB’s mission is to use all available international channels to improve working conditions, raise living standards, protect workers’ ability to exercise their rights, and address the workplace exploitation of children and other vulnerable populations."
http://www.dol.gov/ilab/mission.htm#.UMS2q1KrFQw
***
Hey, that doesn't sound too good.
Yep. That's as commie pinko as it sounds.
Oh, but this gets better. Oh, so much better.
ILAB has its own sub-bureaucracy, the Office of International Relations, or OIR. What does the OIR do ?
I'm not going to like this, am I ?
Nope.
***
"The Office of International Relations represents or facilitates representation of the U.S. Government in the International Labor Organization (ILO) and the labor components of international organizations; provides expertise, research and advice on labor and employment trends and issues in foreign countries; and helps facilitate the sharing of information between specialized DOL agencies and other countries. The ILO is the primary labor standard setting and monitoring organization in the world."
http://www.dol.gov/ILAB/programs/oir/#.UMS5zVKrFQw
***
I---we---Can they---
Don't get all wobbly on me now, patriot! There's more! Guess who runs the ILO ?
***
"The International Labour Organization (ILO) is the only tripartite U.N. agency with government, employer, and worker representatives. This tripartite structure makes the ILO a unique forum in which the governments and the social partners of the economy of its 185 Member States can freely and openly debate and elaborate labour standards and policies."
http://www.ilo.org/global/about-the-ilo/who-we-are/lang--en/index.htm
***
What does this mean for everyday folks like us ?
It means more of our money is redistributed to folks in the Third World who deserve it way more than we who earned it. For example:
***
"DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Bureau of International Labor Affairs
Project to Strengthen Worker Organizations in Haiti and Peru
ANNOUNCEMENT TYPE: New. Notice of Availability of Funds and Solicitation for
Cooperative Agreement Applications.
FUNDING OPPORTUNITY NUMBER: SGA 12-17
CATALOG OF FEDERAL DOMESTIC ASSISTANCE (CFDA) NUMBER: Not
applicable.
KEY DATES: Issuance Date: October 9, 2012 Closing Date: November 15, 2012 Closing Time: 5:00 PM EST Deadline for Submission of Technical Questions: October 18, 2012 Date of Award: No later than December 31, 2012
TOTAL FUNDING AVAILABLE FOR AWARD: $2.2 million.
NUMBER AND TYPES OF ANTICIPATED FUNDING AWARDS: One or more
cooperative agreements.
ELIGIBLE APPLICANTS: Any commercial, international, educational, or non-profit
organization(s), including any faith-based, community-based, or public international
organization(s) capable of successfully building the capacity of worker organizations in Haiti
and/or Peru.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Labor (USDOL), Bureau of
International Labor Affairs (ILAB) announces its intent to award up to $2.2 million for one or
more cooperative agreements to one or more organizations in order to strengthen
independent, democratic worker organizations in Haiti and Peru. The duration of the projects
funded by this solicitation can be up to four years and six months. The start date of program
activities will be negotiated upon award of an individual cooperative agreement, but will be
no later than December 31, 2012.
Applications will be accepted via electronic submission to www.grants.gov or by hardcopy
(to include electronic copy/CD) hand delivered or mailed to the Grant Officer at the
following address:
USDOL/Office of Procurement Services
Attn: Brenda White, Grant Officer
200 Constitution Avenue NW, Room S-4307
Washington, DC 20210
Reference: SGA 12-17
AGENCY CONTACTS:
Primary: Brenda J. White, Grant Officer Alternate: James Kinslow, Grant Officer"
http://www.dol.gov/ilab/grants/SGA12-17.pdf
***
In other words, we have our own Obamunintern. Forward, indeed.
Ladies and gentlemen, I'm fully aware that this wouldn't even be a drop in the bucket when it comes to spending by the Federal Leviathan. After all, our dog eating Homosexual Agenda Pusher in Chief, Barack Hussein Obama, spends $2.2 mil before he grabs his golf bag in the afternoon. Defunding ILAB or the OIR won't bring us to some sort of of Right Wing Utopia. I get that.
But at the same time, we can't ignore things like this, either. The federal government is now using tax dollars to spread Marxist propaganda by using unaccountable, unconstitutional bureaucracies Take a moment and let that sink in. This is as sinister as it gets. If you need further proof, take a gander who's running the show at ILAB:
***
"Carol Pier was sworn in as the Associate Deputy Undersecretary for International Affairs at the Department of Labor on August 24, 2009. In that capacity, she assists the Deputy Undersecretary in carrying out her responsibilities.
For ten years prior to her appointment, Ms. Pier worked on labor rights and trade issues for Human Rights Watch, the largest U.S.-based non-governmental organization dedicated to promoting and protecting human rights. She documented and reported on workers' rights violations around the world, analyzed foreign and domestic labor laws, and engaged in advocacy on labor rights and trade matters in the United States and abroad.
Ms. Pier is a graduate of Harvard Law School and holds a B.A. from the University of Notre Dame."
http://www.dol.gov/ilab/leadership.htm#.UMUwmVKrFQw
***
Hmmm..."Human Rights Watch".....Why does that word make the hairs on the back of my neck stand at the position of attention ? Oh wait, now I remember! This is why:
***
"While professing neutrality in matters of war and peace, [Human Rights Watch] has been a staunch foe of the American-led war on terror. The organization was a signatory to a November 1, 2001 document characterizing the 9/11 attacks as a legal matter to be addressed by criminal-justice procedures rather than military means. Ascribing the hijackers’ motives to alleged social injustices against which they were protesting, this document explained that 'security and justice are mutually reinforcing goals that ultimately depend upon the promotion of all human rights for all people,' and called on the United States 'to promote fundamental rights around the world.' Similarly, in 2002 HRW claimed that the United States and its coalition allies 'have substituted expediency for the firm commitment to human rights that alone can defeat the rationale of terrorism.' Moreover, HRW warned that 'the coalition risks reinforcing the logic of terrorism unless human rights are given a far more central role.' That is, unless coalition forces followed HRW’s distinctive definition of human rights, they were only reinforcing the 'view that anything goes in the name of a cause.' "
http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/groupProfile.asp?grpid=6258
***
And guess who helps fund Human Rights Watch ? C'mon...take a guess,,,,
***
"In accepting a huge grant [$100 million] from George Soros, Human Rights Watch has spurned the public advice (and warning) offered nearly a year ago by its founder Robert Bernstein. Rather than grapple with the serious problems of credibility and bias, HRW Executive Director Kenneth Roth has cemented relations with Soros -- a partisan ideologue who also supports Moveon.org, a controversial advocacy group."
http://www.nypost.com/p/news/opinion/opedcolumnists/selling_out_to_soros_iYfn7YXaZg8xEFCp5iEcCJ
***
We're on the edge of complete political, economic, and social disaster. I can't gussy it up. I can't make it sound palatable. It is what it is. The end is nigh, God help us all.
Wednesday, November 28, 2012
The "Minorities Are Blameless No Matter What" Tactic
Al Michaels: Newton drops back....here comes the blitz from the Giants! Newton on the move...wobbly pass ....interception! Number 23 for the Giants, cornerback Corey Webster has it! 10...5...Touchdown!
Chris Collingsworth ( during the replay): What a terrible, and I do mean TERRIBLE throw by Cam Newton. I can't even call it a pass. Here he sees the double coverage with Webster and Kenny Phillips on number 89, Steve Smith, and he just unloads a dying duck regardless for a pick six. Cam Newton has just lost the game for the Panthers. No doubt about it.
Al Michaels: Chris, why are you such a racist ? I think you're criticizing Cam's play because you're used to having a white quarterback, probably with blue eyes and blond hair. Don't you know how much pressure there is on a person of color playing quarterback in the NFL ? I'm willing to bet Joe Montana never had to deal with bigoted catcalls from the press box the way Cam does from people like you.
Chris Collingsworth: I---I----
Al Michaels: Save it for the next Tea Party rally, David Duke! I'm outta here!
***
Obviously, in the above hypothetical, I'm using the old Rush Limbaugh trick of "illustrating absurdity by being absurd". The above would never happen in the real world, right ?
Maybe not in sports, but it happens every day in the world of the wacky world of lib politicians and their willing accomplices in the arrogant and lazy media. It doesn't matter if they're defending Jamie Foxx's "lord and savior" Barack HUSSEIN Obama, professional cover-up artist Susan Rice, or some other waste of human DNA, it's always the same game plan: Play the race card no matter what the issue is, even if you're a pasty white liberal living in the 'burbs who rolls up his windows whenever he drives his Volt through a black neighborhood.
The sad truth of this line of thinking is that it's, well.....racist. The whole "minorities are blameless, no matter what" tactic of the Clueless Left is incredibly demeaning. As has been explained by Rush Limbaugh and Mark Levin (and to be fair, countless others, but not nearly as well), it reduces minorities to a permanent child-like status and robs them of their individuality, which is one of God's greatest gifts to man.
Now of course, I don't ever expect the libs to ever understand the above paragraph. They're utterly incapable of rational thought and not exactly the sharpest tools in the shed. So, for their convenience, I've created a handy dandy study guide of what is actual racism:
***
It was racist when the Democrat party supported slavery.
It was racist when the Democrat party formed the Ku Klux Klan.
It was racist when Democrat president and hero to the Progressivik movement Woodrow Wilson segregated the United States military.
It was racist when Margaret Sanger started Planned Parenthood, in part, to exterminate blacks.
It was racist when Democrat President Franklin Dictator Roosevelt rounded up American citizens of Japanese descent and put them in concentr---er, uh, "internment camps".
It was racist when Democrat Bull Connor used fire hoses and police dogs on Civil Rights protesters.
It was racist when Democrat governor of Arkansas Orval Faubus deployed the Arkansas National Guard to prevent black kids from attending Little Rock Central High School.
It was racist every time former Kleagle of the Ku Klux Klan and proud Democrat Robert Byrd was reelected.
It was racist when noted Democrat Jesse Jackson referred to Jews as "hymies" and New York as "Hymietown".
It was racist when noted Democrat Al Sharpton called Jews "diamond merchants" and fanned the flames of the Crown Heights riot.
It was racist when the future Chairman Obama called his own grandmother a "typical white person".
It was racist that the Democrat party's propaganda wing, PMSNBC, gave Al Sharpton a television show. (That no one watches, I'll admit, but it's still highly aggravating.)
It was racist when every lib supported the same Occupy Wall Street (bowel) Movement that the American Nazi party did.
It was racist when the source of Chris Mathews' naughtiest thoughts, Barack Obama, gave a shout out to Nelson Mandela, whose African National Congress is currently committing genocide against the Afrikaner people.
***
The bottom line is this, gang: There is real racism that often leads to horror and there is imaginary racism that helps to obscure real racism. I'd like to say that America knows the difference, (In 2010 I could have. Feels like it was decades ago, huh?) but with the reelection of our Dear Leader and the re-emergence of the mindless "minorities are blameless, no matter what" tactic, but I can't, and at the rate we're going, I don't think I ever will.
We're on the edge of complete social, economic, and political disaster. I can't gussy it up. I can't make it sound palatable. It is what it is. God help us all, the end is nigh.
Chris Collingsworth ( during the replay): What a terrible, and I do mean TERRIBLE throw by Cam Newton. I can't even call it a pass. Here he sees the double coverage with Webster and Kenny Phillips on number 89, Steve Smith, and he just unloads a dying duck regardless for a pick six. Cam Newton has just lost the game for the Panthers. No doubt about it.
Al Michaels: Chris, why are you such a racist ? I think you're criticizing Cam's play because you're used to having a white quarterback, probably with blue eyes and blond hair. Don't you know how much pressure there is on a person of color playing quarterback in the NFL ? I'm willing to bet Joe Montana never had to deal with bigoted catcalls from the press box the way Cam does from people like you.
Chris Collingsworth: I---I----
Al Michaels: Save it for the next Tea Party rally, David Duke! I'm outta here!
***
Obviously, in the above hypothetical, I'm using the old Rush Limbaugh trick of "illustrating absurdity by being absurd". The above would never happen in the real world, right ?
Maybe not in sports, but it happens every day in the world of the wacky world of lib politicians and their willing accomplices in the arrogant and lazy media. It doesn't matter if they're defending Jamie Foxx's "lord and savior" Barack HUSSEIN Obama, professional cover-up artist Susan Rice, or some other waste of human DNA, it's always the same game plan: Play the race card no matter what the issue is, even if you're a pasty white liberal living in the 'burbs who rolls up his windows whenever he drives his Volt through a black neighborhood.
The sad truth of this line of thinking is that it's, well.....racist. The whole "minorities are blameless, no matter what" tactic of the Clueless Left is incredibly demeaning. As has been explained by Rush Limbaugh and Mark Levin (and to be fair, countless others, but not nearly as well), it reduces minorities to a permanent child-like status and robs them of their individuality, which is one of God's greatest gifts to man.
Now of course, I don't ever expect the libs to ever understand the above paragraph. They're utterly incapable of rational thought and not exactly the sharpest tools in the shed. So, for their convenience, I've created a handy dandy study guide of what is actual racism:
***
It was racist when the Democrat party supported slavery.
It was racist when the Democrat party formed the Ku Klux Klan.
It was racist when Democrat president and hero to the Progressivik movement Woodrow Wilson segregated the United States military.
It was racist when Margaret Sanger started Planned Parenthood, in part, to exterminate blacks.
It was racist when Democrat President Franklin Dictator Roosevelt rounded up American citizens of Japanese descent and put them in concentr---er, uh, "internment camps".
It was racist when Democrat Bull Connor used fire hoses and police dogs on Civil Rights protesters.
It was racist when Democrat governor of Arkansas Orval Faubus deployed the Arkansas National Guard to prevent black kids from attending Little Rock Central High School.
It was racist every time former Kleagle of the Ku Klux Klan and proud Democrat Robert Byrd was reelected.
It was racist when noted Democrat Jesse Jackson referred to Jews as "hymies" and New York as "Hymietown".
It was racist when noted Democrat Al Sharpton called Jews "diamond merchants" and fanned the flames of the Crown Heights riot.
It was racist when the future Chairman Obama called his own grandmother a "typical white person".
It was racist that the Democrat party's propaganda wing, PMSNBC, gave Al Sharpton a television show. (That no one watches, I'll admit, but it's still highly aggravating.)
It was racist when every lib supported the same Occupy Wall Street (bowel) Movement that the American Nazi party did.
It was racist when the source of Chris Mathews' naughtiest thoughts, Barack Obama, gave a shout out to Nelson Mandela, whose African National Congress is currently committing genocide against the Afrikaner people.
***
The bottom line is this, gang: There is real racism that often leads to horror and there is imaginary racism that helps to obscure real racism. I'd like to say that America knows the difference, (In 2010 I could have. Feels like it was decades ago, huh?) but with the reelection of our Dear Leader and the re-emergence of the mindless "minorities are blameless, no matter what" tactic, but I can't, and at the rate we're going, I don't think I ever will.
We're on the edge of complete social, economic, and political disaster. I can't gussy it up. I can't make it sound palatable. It is what it is. God help us all, the end is nigh.
Friday, November 16, 2012
Screw You, Ron Paul
An error ended.
Jew hater Ron Paul gave his farewell address to CONgress.
To Ron Paul, the patron saint of malcontents, druggies, and weirdos, I say this: Screw you and good riddance.
Now I know that sounds harsh, but let's face it gang, one of the reasons why we have another four years of of the Hope and Che Guy is Ron Paul. Yeah, I'm going to come right out and say it and I don't give a damn who calls me a "neocon" for saying so. The truth must be told, consequences be damned.
Now, before you call me nuts, really sit and think about it: Did RuPaul (H/T Mark Levin) or his Stormfront troopers attack Mitt Romney and his RINO-riffic campaign during the Republican primaries ? No. They attacked Conservatives like Michele Bachmann, Rick Santorum, and Newt Gingrich, forcing them to waste valuable time and valuable resources defending themselves from baseless attack after baseless attack. (In other words, Cut and Run Paul was Romney's wing man.) To be fair, there's no way of knowing of whether or not one of them would have beaten our Dear Leader (and his dead and imaginary voters), but I'm willing to go out on a limb and say they had a better chance than Romney ever did. At least they stood for something, which is something Romney really can't say with a straight face.
After the primaries ended, and Red Skull Ron was handed yet another predictable loss, did he rally his troops and say, "Look, we lost. But now is not the time to dwell on that. Get out there and support Romney before the country is destroyed by Obama, and that goes for you folks in the Gary Johnson and Virgil Goode camps as well" ? Nope. We got none of that. Instead, we got silence or "Buy my swag! Half-off!" Would this have made a difference ? I don't know, but I'm fairly certain that it wouldn't have hurt. (Yes, I know I lambasted Romney in the previous paragraph, but he did win. Shrimpy should have done the right thing and got behind the primary winner. Bachmann did it, Santorum did it, and so did Gingrich.)
The funny thing about this is the fact that I agree with the Surrender Monkey on several issues. I'm all for auditing the Federal Reserve. I'm all for repealing the 16th and 17th Amendments. I'm all for the US giving the UN the social finger. I am, after all, a hard right winger and I make no apologies for that whatsoever. When Ron Paul isn't blaming the US for 9/11, attacking the military, pushing the homosexual agenda, calling the infanticide known as abortion a "states rights issue", calling the OWS barbarians "victims", or coddling America's Islamonazi enemies, the man makes sense. (Cue up the tired "broken clock" analogy.) I can't and won't deny it. But at the same time I couldn't be happier watching Ron Paul become a meaningless footnote in American history. As far as I'm concerned, another career politician is gone, and last time I checked, that's always a good thing.
Jew hater Ron Paul gave his farewell address to CONgress.
To Ron Paul, the patron saint of malcontents, druggies, and weirdos, I say this: Screw you and good riddance.
Now I know that sounds harsh, but let's face it gang, one of the reasons why we have another four years of of the Hope and Che Guy is Ron Paul. Yeah, I'm going to come right out and say it and I don't give a damn who calls me a "neocon" for saying so. The truth must be told, consequences be damned.
Now, before you call me nuts, really sit and think about it: Did RuPaul (H/T Mark Levin) or his Stormfront troopers attack Mitt Romney and his RINO-riffic campaign during the Republican primaries ? No. They attacked Conservatives like Michele Bachmann, Rick Santorum, and Newt Gingrich, forcing them to waste valuable time and valuable resources defending themselves from baseless attack after baseless attack. (In other words, Cut and Run Paul was Romney's wing man.) To be fair, there's no way of knowing of whether or not one of them would have beaten our Dear Leader (and his dead and imaginary voters), but I'm willing to go out on a limb and say they had a better chance than Romney ever did. At least they stood for something, which is something Romney really can't say with a straight face.
After the primaries ended, and Red Skull Ron was handed yet another predictable loss, did he rally his troops and say, "Look, we lost. But now is not the time to dwell on that. Get out there and support Romney before the country is destroyed by Obama, and that goes for you folks in the Gary Johnson and Virgil Goode camps as well" ? Nope. We got none of that. Instead, we got silence or "Buy my swag! Half-off!" Would this have made a difference ? I don't know, but I'm fairly certain that it wouldn't have hurt. (Yes, I know I lambasted Romney in the previous paragraph, but he did win. Shrimpy should have done the right thing and got behind the primary winner. Bachmann did it, Santorum did it, and so did Gingrich.)
The funny thing about this is the fact that I agree with the Surrender Monkey on several issues. I'm all for auditing the Federal Reserve. I'm all for repealing the 16th and 17th Amendments. I'm all for the US giving the UN the social finger. I am, after all, a hard right winger and I make no apologies for that whatsoever. When Ron Paul isn't blaming the US for 9/11, attacking the military, pushing the homosexual agenda, calling the infanticide known as abortion a "states rights issue", calling the OWS barbarians "victims", or coddling America's Islamonazi enemies, the man makes sense. (Cue up the tired "broken clock" analogy.) I can't and won't deny it. But at the same time I couldn't be happier watching Ron Paul become a meaningless footnote in American history. As far as I'm concerned, another career politician is gone, and last time I checked, that's always a good thing.
Saturday, November 10, 2012
The Pseudo-Jews Strike Again!
The Pseudo-Jews strike again. Another knife in the back. Et tu, Shlomo ?
Now, before I get myself in some hot water and get charged with a hate crime or something, I'm going to come right out and say it. I'm Jewish. I eat bagels and lox like it's going out of style. I cry like a baby every time I watch Schindler's List. I call my mother every chance I get, despite the fact that I'm wracked with guilt for hours afterword. I spend every Passover at my Aunt Esther's house and make small talk with relatives I can't stand. If that isn't proof that I'm Jewish, I'll show you some embarrassing Bar Mitzvah photos after a few Jack and Cokes.
Now that the politicalcorrectthink crap is out of the way, I will now proceed to tear into the 70% of my fellow "Jews" who voted to reelect Barack HUSSEIN Obama, friend to the Muzzie Brotherhood. Yep, you read that right, Dear Reader. According to World Net Daily, (http://www.wnd.com/2012/11/70-of-jewish-population-voted-for-obama/) 70% of the Jewish vote went to the dog-eating piece of human debris that bowed to the inbred king of Saudi Arabia and made it a point to treat Bibi Netanyahu like he had some sort of communicable disease. Yeah, the same former Barry Soetero who's in Nazi collaborator George $oros's back pocket got more than a super majority of the Jewish vote.
Let me go out on a limb and say something very, very controversial. This is like a Jewish lawyer begging for leniency for the likes of Goring, Frank, and Kaltenbrunner at the Nuremberg Trial. It is that vile and detestable.
Gasp! How dare you ?!
I dare say it because the facts are on my side. Our Kenyan Fuhrer has:
Not only that, my "fellow" Jews, with their vote for Pharaoh Obama, has given a stamp of approval for:
Now, I'm no rabbinical scholar or anything, but I'm fairly certain God finds the above concepts to be abominations. Last time I checked, we Jews worship God. Crazy, but true.
I don't know what to say anymore, Pseudo-Jews. This is inexcusable. This is far beyond the pale. You're succeeding where Hitler failed. You're destroying the United States of America and Judaism. I hope what ever justification you have for this was worth it to you. I hope it was worth spitting on the unmarked graves in Poland and Greece that house many of my great aunts, uncles, and cousins. I really do.
On that cheery note, I leave you with this gem from the All Democrats League (ADL):
***
"We congratulate President Barack Obama on his re-election victory and wish him well as he begins to chart a course for the country over the next four years.
As President Obama made clear in his acceptance speech last night, America has many challenges ahead. We look forward to working with the president and his administration to support many of the common values we share for a strong America and a strong State of Israel."
http://www.adl.org/PresRele/Mise_00/President_Obama_Reelection_110712.htm
***
To my Jewish brothers and sisters who did the right thing on Terrible Tuesday, thank you. I will always stand with you, just as I will always stand with my Catholic and Protestant brothers and sisters who did the right thing.
As for you, Pseudo-Jews.....go shove another spare rib in your mouth.
Now, before I get myself in some hot water and get charged with a hate crime or something, I'm going to come right out and say it. I'm Jewish. I eat bagels and lox like it's going out of style. I cry like a baby every time I watch Schindler's List. I call my mother every chance I get, despite the fact that I'm wracked with guilt for hours afterword. I spend every Passover at my Aunt Esther's house and make small talk with relatives I can't stand. If that isn't proof that I'm Jewish, I'll show you some embarrassing Bar Mitzvah photos after a few Jack and Cokes.
Now that the politicalcorrectthink crap is out of the way, I will now proceed to tear into the 70% of my fellow "Jews" who voted to reelect Barack HUSSEIN Obama, friend to the Muzzie Brotherhood. Yep, you read that right, Dear Reader. According to World Net Daily, (http://www.wnd.com/2012/11/70-of-jewish-population-voted-for-obama/) 70% of the Jewish vote went to the dog-eating piece of human debris that bowed to the inbred king of Saudi Arabia and made it a point to treat Bibi Netanyahu like he had some sort of communicable disease. Yeah, the same former Barry Soetero who's in Nazi collaborator George $oros's back pocket got more than a super majority of the Jewish vote.
Let me go out on a limb and say something very, very controversial. This is like a Jewish lawyer begging for leniency for the likes of Goring, Frank, and Kaltenbrunner at the Nuremberg Trial. It is that vile and detestable.
Gasp! How dare you ?!
I dare say it because the facts are on my side. Our Kenyan Fuhrer has:
- stated it would be best if Israel shrunk down to its indefensible 1967 borders.
- helped install Muzzie Brotherhood Islamonazi regimes in Libya and Egypt that are committed to murdering every Jew in Israel.
- refused to help the Green Revolution in Iran that wanted to topple Mahmoud Ahmedinjad, another lunatic who wants to commit genocide.
- embraced the Occupy Wall Street movement that was infested with Neo-Nazis and antisemites.
- been endorsed by notorious Jew haters Louis Farrakhan, Malik Zulu Shabazz, and believe it or not, White Aryan Resistance leader Tom Metzger.
Not only that, my "fellow" Jews, with their vote for Pharaoh Obama, has given a stamp of approval for:
- the vicious persecution of Catholics through Obamacare.
- the infanticide known abortion.
- homosexual "marriage".
Now, I'm no rabbinical scholar or anything, but I'm fairly certain God finds the above concepts to be abominations. Last time I checked, we Jews worship God. Crazy, but true.
I don't know what to say anymore, Pseudo-Jews. This is inexcusable. This is far beyond the pale. You're succeeding where Hitler failed. You're destroying the United States of America and Judaism. I hope what ever justification you have for this was worth it to you. I hope it was worth spitting on the unmarked graves in Poland and Greece that house many of my great aunts, uncles, and cousins. I really do.
On that cheery note, I leave you with this gem from the All Democrats League (ADL):
***
"We congratulate President Barack Obama on his re-election victory and wish him well as he begins to chart a course for the country over the next four years.
As President Obama made clear in his acceptance speech last night, America has many challenges ahead. We look forward to working with the president and his administration to support many of the common values we share for a strong America and a strong State of Israel."
http://www.adl.org/PresRele/Mise_00/President_Obama_Reelection_110712.htm
***
To my Jewish brothers and sisters who did the right thing on Terrible Tuesday, thank you. I will always stand with you, just as I will always stand with my Catholic and Protestant brothers and sisters who did the right thing.
As for you, Pseudo-Jews.....go shove another spare rib in your mouth.
Wednesday, November 7, 2012
We Lost...Who To Blame And Why
We lost.
We the People got our teeth kicked down our throat.
I know that sounds harsh, but let's face it fellow Republicans, we're members of a party that failed to defeat a racist, dog-eating, homosexual agenda pushing piece of human garbage who isn't qualified to be a cashier at 7-11, let alone be President of the United States. We, the party of strong economies and national defense, failed as a party to dislodge an economically illiterate man who hates the US military with a passion. In short, this election was an absolute train wreck that may very well destroy the Republic.
Why did this happen, and more importantly, who do we blame ?
The Republican party, like a kid who can't sit still, refuses to learn. Moderate Republicanism and RINOs suck. They're about as exciting as lukewarm bath water. They stand for absolutely nothing. And yet, time and time again, ever since Reagan, they're all the Republican party offers on the presidential stage. Bob Dole ran a tepid, lackluster campaign in 1996 that ended in defeat, as did John McCain in 2008, and Mitt Romney in 2012. Yes Bush I and II won, but let's face the cold hard reality about them. Bush I shed his Reaganite skin like a rattlesnake the moment Ronaldus Magnus went back to his ranch and proceeded to lose to accused rapist Bill Caligula. Bush II won and was magnificent on the War on Terror, but was Herbert Hoover on domestic policy.
To this day, I still have no idea what any of the above folks ran on. (Except for the 2004 election, when it was rather clear it was either Bush or pray to Mecca.) Bush I ? He was Reagan's Veep. Bob Dole ? No idea. Bush II's first run ? I dunno, I voted for Pat Buchanan because it wasn't Conservative, whatever it was. John McCain ? Well, it was his turn. Romney ? He wasn't the guy who bowed to the inbred king of Saudi Arabia. They never gave me a reason to support them, other than party loyalty. That's a horrid reason to vote for anyone. What's worse, they never gave libertarians, paleocons, Reagan Democrats, or independents a reason to vote for them, either. And hence, they lost (except for Bush II) and in some cases, in a rather embarrassing fashion.
Ladies and gentlemen, the reality of the situation is this: We the People need to take back the Republican party before we do anything else. We need to take over our local Republican parties and send the RINOs packing. Is it easier said than done ? Yep, but what choice do we have ? A third party won't save the day. Working with the communists in the Democrat party is unthinkable for a variety of obvious reasons. We need to stand up and say, "Dont Tread On Me."
We the People got our teeth kicked down our throat.
I know that sounds harsh, but let's face it fellow Republicans, we're members of a party that failed to defeat a racist, dog-eating, homosexual agenda pushing piece of human garbage who isn't qualified to be a cashier at 7-11, let alone be President of the United States. We, the party of strong economies and national defense, failed as a party to dislodge an economically illiterate man who hates the US military with a passion. In short, this election was an absolute train wreck that may very well destroy the Republic.
Why did this happen, and more importantly, who do we blame ?
The Republican party, like a kid who can't sit still, refuses to learn. Moderate Republicanism and RINOs suck. They're about as exciting as lukewarm bath water. They stand for absolutely nothing. And yet, time and time again, ever since Reagan, they're all the Republican party offers on the presidential stage. Bob Dole ran a tepid, lackluster campaign in 1996 that ended in defeat, as did John McCain in 2008, and Mitt Romney in 2012. Yes Bush I and II won, but let's face the cold hard reality about them. Bush I shed his Reaganite skin like a rattlesnake the moment Ronaldus Magnus went back to his ranch and proceeded to lose to accused rapist Bill Caligula. Bush II won and was magnificent on the War on Terror, but was Herbert Hoover on domestic policy.
To this day, I still have no idea what any of the above folks ran on. (Except for the 2004 election, when it was rather clear it was either Bush or pray to Mecca.) Bush I ? He was Reagan's Veep. Bob Dole ? No idea. Bush II's first run ? I dunno, I voted for Pat Buchanan because it wasn't Conservative, whatever it was. John McCain ? Well, it was his turn. Romney ? He wasn't the guy who bowed to the inbred king of Saudi Arabia. They never gave me a reason to support them, other than party loyalty. That's a horrid reason to vote for anyone. What's worse, they never gave libertarians, paleocons, Reagan Democrats, or independents a reason to vote for them, either. And hence, they lost (except for Bush II) and in some cases, in a rather embarrassing fashion.
Ladies and gentlemen, the reality of the situation is this: We the People need to take back the Republican party before we do anything else. We need to take over our local Republican parties and send the RINOs packing. Is it easier said than done ? Yep, but what choice do we have ? A third party won't save the day. Working with the communists in the Democrat party is unthinkable for a variety of obvious reasons. We need to stand up and say, "Dont Tread On Me."
Wednesday, October 31, 2012
To The Libertarians, Paleocons, and Ron Paul Supporters
As we thankfully reach the end of the campaign season, I thought it would be a really swell idea to address the libertarians, paleoconservatives, and Ron Paul supporters who think it's somehow a noble sentiment to throw their votes away on either Gary Johnson, Virgil Goode, or write in Ron Paul. According to to the latest polls from Rasmussen, you're only 1% of the vote, but if history teaches us anything, polls are nothing more than educated guesses at best and the source of wet dreams for overpaid TV pundits at very worst.
Ready ? Here we go: Please, for the love of creatures big and small, use your head for more than a hat rack and vote for Mitt Romney and as many Republicans as you possibly can in the down ticket races.
I under your concerns. In many cases I share them. I'm a Conservative, but I'm in agreement with you on a lot of things. Libertarians, I'm with you on the so-called "War on Drugs". I'm in favor of the legalization of marijuana. I'm with you on many economic issues as well. Paleocons, I'm with you on many social issues. Ron Paul supporters, I'm with you on the Federal Reserve. I'm also with you on the repealing the 17th Amendment. I know Mitt Romney isn't going to address any of these issues during the campaign, nor do I think he would address them as president. This is disappointing, but it's not the end of the world.
Dog eating, Jew hating, Catholic persecuting Barack Hussein Obama getting another term would be.
There has never been a more scandal ridden presidency like this in American history. There has never been a more dangerously incompetent presidency like this in American history. What's worse, there has never been a government that has spent this much money in world history. That's we're at, gang. We're staring into an abyss that would scare the hell out of Satan himself. Because of the actions of this president and his collectivist lackeys in CONgress and the bloated federal bureaucracy, the United States is on the edge of complete economic, political, and social disaster from which there will be no recovery.
I know many of you have qualms with the Republican party as well. I understand them and share them as well. I cringe the same way you do every time some weak willed, sit-down-when-they-pee-GOP-E type lies down for the Authoritarian Left. I, like you, find these RINO types who infest the Republican party repulsive in every way, but they're bound to be better than a committed socialist like faux Cherokee Elizabeth Warren. (Even if it's by default.) I know you hate being pushed into voting for the lesser of two evils, but it is what it is. We don't live in Fantasyland, we live in what Rush Limbaugh calls "Literalville" and there's no use in pretending otherwise.
Sure we have our disagreements, Libertarians, Paleocons, and Ron Paul supporters. Some of you hate Israel. Some of you think the Republican party is the party of the "Military-Industrial Complex". (As a side note, who seems to have more blood dripping from his fangs ? The serene Mormon who rationally laid down his case for ending Iran's ability to build nuclear weapons or the wild eyed ideologue who spikes the bin Laden football every chance he gets ?) Some of you believe in homosexual "marriage". Some of you believe the "right" to murder unborn children. Needless to say, I vehemently disagree with you and will fight you tooth and nail on these and many other issues. You know what ? That's fine. They're healthy conversations we need to have as a movement and as a country, but the last thing any of us need is Chairman Obama and his boss George $oros deciding these arguments for us.
Libertarians, Paleocons, and Ron Paul supporters, the choice is yours. Choose wisely.
Ready ? Here we go: Please, for the love of creatures big and small, use your head for more than a hat rack and vote for Mitt Romney and as many Republicans as you possibly can in the down ticket races.
I under your concerns. In many cases I share them. I'm a Conservative, but I'm in agreement with you on a lot of things. Libertarians, I'm with you on the so-called "War on Drugs". I'm in favor of the legalization of marijuana. I'm with you on many economic issues as well. Paleocons, I'm with you on many social issues. Ron Paul supporters, I'm with you on the Federal Reserve. I'm also with you on the repealing the 17th Amendment. I know Mitt Romney isn't going to address any of these issues during the campaign, nor do I think he would address them as president. This is disappointing, but it's not the end of the world.
Dog eating, Jew hating, Catholic persecuting Barack Hussein Obama getting another term would be.
There has never been a more scandal ridden presidency like this in American history. There has never been a more dangerously incompetent presidency like this in American history. What's worse, there has never been a government that has spent this much money in world history. That's we're at, gang. We're staring into an abyss that would scare the hell out of Satan himself. Because of the actions of this president and his collectivist lackeys in CONgress and the bloated federal bureaucracy, the United States is on the edge of complete economic, political, and social disaster from which there will be no recovery.
I know many of you have qualms with the Republican party as well. I understand them and share them as well. I cringe the same way you do every time some weak willed, sit-down-when-they-pee-GOP-E type lies down for the Authoritarian Left. I, like you, find these RINO types who infest the Republican party repulsive in every way, but they're bound to be better than a committed socialist like faux Cherokee Elizabeth Warren. (Even if it's by default.) I know you hate being pushed into voting for the lesser of two evils, but it is what it is. We don't live in Fantasyland, we live in what Rush Limbaugh calls "Literalville" and there's no use in pretending otherwise.
Sure we have our disagreements, Libertarians, Paleocons, and Ron Paul supporters. Some of you hate Israel. Some of you think the Republican party is the party of the "Military-Industrial Complex". (As a side note, who seems to have more blood dripping from his fangs ? The serene Mormon who rationally laid down his case for ending Iran's ability to build nuclear weapons or the wild eyed ideologue who spikes the bin Laden football every chance he gets ?) Some of you believe in homosexual "marriage". Some of you believe the "right" to murder unborn children. Needless to say, I vehemently disagree with you and will fight you tooth and nail on these and many other issues. You know what ? That's fine. They're healthy conversations we need to have as a movement and as a country, but the last thing any of us need is Chairman Obama and his boss George $oros deciding these arguments for us.
Libertarians, Paleocons, and Ron Paul supporters, the choice is yours. Choose wisely.
Friday, October 19, 2012
I Hate The Misery Pimps In The Media
You know, when it's all said and done, I absolutely hate the arrogant and lazy misery pimps in the mainstream media.
Let me say that again, because it feels so, soooooo good:
I absolutely hate the arrogant and lazy misery pimps in the mainstream media.
I hate their incompetence. I hate their bias. I hate their dishonesty. In short, they're the lowest form of life on God's green and cooling earth, right down there with members of CONgress, people who eat dogs while growing up as a Muslim in Indonesia, people who falsely claim to be Cherokee Indians, and self important rectal openings who feel the need to raise their voices a zillion decibels while talking on a cell phone.
Case and point:
H/T to ReidBaerPoetry
Let me say that again, because it feels so, soooooo good:
I absolutely hate the arrogant and lazy misery pimps in the mainstream media.
I hate their incompetence. I hate their bias. I hate their dishonesty. In short, they're the lowest form of life on God's green and cooling earth, right down there with members of CONgress, people who eat dogs while growing up as a Muslim in Indonesia, people who falsely claim to be Cherokee Indians, and self important rectal openings who feel the need to raise their voices a zillion decibels while talking on a cell phone.
Case and point:
H/T to ReidBaerPoetry
Are You Ready For ANOTHER Solyndra, Patriots ?
Is jy gereed vir 'n ander Solyndra, patriotte?
(Translation from Afrikaans to English: Are you ready for another Solyndra, patriots ?)
***
From the Export-Import Bank of The United States:
***
"JOHANNESBURG, SOUTH AFRICA: The Export-Import Bank of the United States (Ex-Im Bank) and the Industrial Development Corp. of South Africa Ltd. (IDC) today signed a Declaration of Intent (DoI) to help advance the South African government’s Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) and the South African Renewable Initiative (SARi). Under the agreement, Ex-Im Bank will assist in financing up to $2 billion worth of U.S. technologies, products and services to South Africa’s energy sector, with an emphasis on clean-energy development.
Signing the DOI were Fred P. Hochberg, Ex-Im Bank chairman and president; Geoffrey Quena, chief executive officer of the IDC; and Gert Gouws, chief financial officer of the IDC. The signing took place during the South Africa-United States Strategic Dialogue, which was hosted by U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.
'South Africa is a dynamic market that offers enormous opportunities for American companies,' said Chairman Hochberg. 'This agreement will help ensure that Ex-Im Bank continues to provide financing to South African buyers that want to buy high-quality U.S. goods and services. This partnership will help create jobs and lasting economic opportunities for both our countries.'
Established in 1940, the IDC is a South African national development finance institution set up to promote economic growth and industrial development. It is owned by the South African government under the supervision of the Economic Development department. The IDC's primary objectives are to contribute to the creation of balanced, sustainable economic growth in South Africa and on the rest of the continent.
Ex-Im Bank is open in over 180 countries and has identified nine key markets that offer great potential for U.S. exports. South Africa was chosen as one of these markets due to the size of its economy and close trading and investment ties to the United States. South Africa is the largest economy in Africa and the 29th largest economy in the world. Its GDP growth rate is expected to be 2.2 percent in 2012 and 2.7 percent in 2013.
As the largest U.S. export market in sub-Saharan Africa with $7.3 billion of exports in 2011, South Africa is a key economic partner for the United States. Additionally, South Africa is seeking significant investments in the following sectors: power, aviation, transportation and mining, thus creating a demand for high-quality American products and services in these industries. Ex-Im Bank authorized more than $930 million in financing to support U.S. exports to South Africa in FY 2011."
http://www.exim.gov/pressrelease.cfm/1EA4777D-97F2-F40E-978564826E8D33A2/
***
Before we dig into this billion dollar man-made disaster, I guess we should learn exactly what the "Export-Import of The United States" actually is.
From the good folks at the Heritage Foundation:
***
"The Export-Import Bank provides taxpayer-subsidized loans to U.S. exporters. The bank’s charter will expire at the end of May. President Obama supports a four-year extension and, further, wants to increase the bank’s $100 billion loan limit by an additional $40 billion.
Speaking last week at Heritage, Rep. Justin Amash (R-MI) said the bank should be completely abolished. His legislation, the Export-Import Bank Termination Act, would end this form of corporate welfare.
'[The Ex-Im Bank] basically provides government-subsidized, essentially loans, low-interest payments, and all the rest to foreign corporations that receive exports from American companies,' Amash explained. 'It’s the kind of corporate welfare we should do away with. We should have a free-market system; taxpayers shouldn’t be on the hook for subsidized loans to anyone. I see it as just another Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac in the making and I have a bill to end it.'
Despite opposition from conservatives, House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-VA) and Minority Whip Steny Hoyer (D-MD) reportedly reached an agreement to extend the bank’s lending authority.
Supporters of the extension claim there is greater demand for the bank’s services because of combined effects of the collapse of the financial markets in 2008 and 2009 and the European debt crisis. Critics, however, complain that expanding the bank’s loan limit in this environment is asking for a repeat of Fannie and Freddie. Even at its best, the bank just picks winners of a few exporters and hopes there are no losers."
http://blog.heritage.org/2012/05/04/congressman-export-import-bank-is-a-case-of-corporate-welfare/
***
Give yourself a gold star, Dear Reader! You're right! This is not a good thing. In fact, it's about as good as a long term stay in a Turkish prison. The Export-Import Bank has loaned YOUR money to the likes of Pemex (the state oil company of Mexico) and Petrobras (the state oil company of Brazil). Think about that as you pay $3.80 a gallon at the pump. (Just make sure you haven't eaten in the last hour before doing so. The author bears no responsibility if you blow chunks in your car.)
But don't worry. You may be getting screwed, but at least someone is making money. That person is...wait for it...wait for it...
Yep! The Fuhrer himself, George $oros, has made a killing from this type of Crony Capitalism.
***
"His New York-based hedge-fund firm, Soros Fund Management LLC, sold 22 million U.S.-listed common shares of Petrobras, as the Brazilian oil company is known, according to a filing today with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Soros bought 5.8 million of the company’s U.S.-traded preferred shares.
Soros is taking advantage of the spread between the two types of U.S.-listed Petrobras shares, said Luis Maizel, president of LM Capital Group LLC, which manages about $4 billion. The common shares were 21 percent more expensive than preferred today, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.
Petrobras preferred shares have also a 10 percent additional dividend, said William Landers, a senior portfolio manager for Latin America at Blackrock Inc.
'Given that there will most likely never be a change in control in the company, I see no reason to pay a higher price for the common shares.' Brazil’s government controls Petrobras and has a majority stake of voting shares."
http://hotair.com/archives/2009/08/18/good-news-obama-backs-off-shore-drilling/
***
Angry yet ? No ? Well, I'm just gonna have to try harder. Fred Hochberg, the chairman of the Export-Import Bank is as dirty as they get.
From the Washington Compost :
***
"Hochberg is a longtime Democratic Party donor and was among the overnight guests in the Clinton White House. He was a bundler for both Hillary Clinton and Obama in 2008. During the 2008 election cycle, he donated more than $108,000, almost exclusively to Democratic candidates and the party. Hochberg was appointed by Clinton as a deputy and acting administrator of the Small Business Administration and ran that agency's transition effort under Obama. He has served as dean of the New School for Management and Urban Policy and on the boards of several public agencies, charitable organizations and private companies."
http://projects.washingtonpost.com/2009/federal-appointments/person/fred-p-hochberg/
***
And guess what ? The openly homosexual Hochberg flew through his Imperial Senate confirmation vote to head up the Export-Import bank. In fact, it was unanimous. (Way to go, Team -R. Way to go. Your courage is inspiring. /sarc) Now, at this point, I thought we'd be done with Fuhrer $oros, but I'm loaded with caffeine, and Bing is just so darn easy to use. (Memo to the bottom feeders in the arrogant and lazy mainstream media: Give it a try one day. Maybe, just maybe, you'll outscoop me one day. I doubt it, but why not give the old college a try ?)
When he's not doing the Crony Capitalism thing, Fred Hochberg likes to be a left-wing nutjob. He was a former board member of the Human Rights Campaign, a radical LGBT "rights" group. In 2008, it received $200, 000 from the $oros funded Open Society Institute. (H/T Discover the Networks ). In fact, the Human Rights Campaign is filled with raving left-wing commie lunatics.
From Discover the Networks:
***
"Meanwhile, other HRC personnel maintain close ties to all manner of leftwing political figures and activist groups:
Ty Cobb previously served as counsel to Senator Ted Kennedy.
Allison Herwitt was a former lobbyist with the National Abortion Rights Action League, now known as NARAL Pro-Choice America.
Darrin Hurwitz served as in-house legal counsel for America Coming Together.
Terry McGuire worked with the New Mexico League of Conservation Voters on behalf of John Kerry's 2004 presidential campaign.
Susanne Salkind was a regional field manager for NARAL Pro-Choice America.
Christine Sloane has held positions with Greenpeace USA and NARAL Pro-Choice North Carolina.
David M. Smith was communications director for Senator Ted Kennedy.
Joe Solomonese (HRC president) is the former CEO of EMILY’s List. He began his career working as an aide to Democratic governor Michael Dukakis of Massachusetts, and also assisted with Barney Frank’s 1990 congressional campaign.
David A.C. Turley worked for Barack Obama’s presidential campaign in 2008, after Hillary Clinton had dropped out of the race.
Cuc Vu worked for AFL-CIO and the SEIU alongside Eliseo Medina. She is also a founding board member of the Mi Familia Vota Education Fund and has served on the board of the National Immigration Forum. "
http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/printgroupProfile.asp?grpid=7619
***
Given the fact that the Export-Import Bank is infested with leftist corruption, it's no real surprise that it would bend over backwards for the communist African National Congress government that's running South Africa into the ground. (Regardless of what the lapdogs in the arrogant and lazy mainstream media would have you believe, South Africa simply traded one tyranny for another when the socialist Nationalist government, which instituted Apartheid, fell and was replaced by the ANC, who at one point had death camps---I'm sorry---"reeducation camps" in Angola. I throw up a little in my mouth every time some lib journalist calls Nelson Mandela a "civil rights activist".)
In fact, Genocide Watch (not exactly a right-wing outfit) had this to say about the deteriorating conditions in South Africa:
***
"After many years when such songs were no longer sung, in 2010, prominent members of the ANC Youth League, in particular Julius Malema, President of the ANC Youth League, openly sang the 'Shoot the Boer' song at ANC Youth League rallies. Not only did revival of the song strike fear into the hearts of Boer farmers, but it has actually been sung during attacks on white farmers. It is an incitement to murder white Afrikaner farmers. Over 3000 white farmers have been murdered since 1994. The South African police have not made investigation and prosecution of these farm murders a priority, dismissing them as crimes by common criminals.
The government has disbanded the commando units of white farmers that once protected their farms, and has passed laws to confiscate the farmers’ weapons. Disarmament of a targeted group is one of the surest early warning signs of future genocidal killings. A recent outbreak of violent farm invasions has led to casualties among white South Africans. The farm invasions are direct results of calls by Julius Malema and his Deputy, Ronald Lamola for whites to give up their land without compensation, or face violence by angry black youths 'flooding their farms.' "
http://www.genocidewatch.org/southafrica.html
***
In other words, South Africa is about to turn into Zimbabwe. Just ask South African president (and wannabe genocidal dictator) Jacob Zuma. Again, from Genocide Watch:
***
"President Jacob Zuma sang 'Shoot the Boer' at the ANC Centenary Celebration event in January of 2012. He claimed that its use at the ANC Centenary was not intended as hate speech, but rather to commemorate the struggle against apartheid. Despite President Zuma’s proclaimed intent, his singing of the song may be contributing to an increasingly hostile environment that threatens the safety of white South Africans. The number of murders of Boer farmers has increased each month in 2012."
http://www.genocidewatch.org/southafrica.html
***
Ladies and gentlemen, should our tax dollars be going to maniacs like this ? Would this be any different than handing billions of dollars to Idi Amin or Papa Doc ? I'll freely admit that I'm somewhat biased since I have some Afrikaner bloed in me, but c'mon! How much more blatant does this need to be ? (I'm also a proud Zionist Jew in addition to being a natural born American Conservative. Needless to say, I'm probably the most politically unacceptable human being on God's green and cooling Earth. Oh, how I relish it!)
Aside from the fact that "green" energy is nothing more than commie snake oil and that there's a very good chance the loan will never be repaid since South Africa is drifting closer and closer to civil war, South Africa doesn't even need the money. If it wanted to waste billions on solar panels, it could use its own money. South Africa is the fourth largest gold producer in the world and its fifth largest diamond producer. The only reason South Africa is "poor" (compared to the United States, but certainly not when compared to the rest of Africa) is its government. The Apartheid Nationalist government was a collectivist nightmare and the African National Congress is even worse. South Africa has never had a true free market economic system and the end result of that is its current societal anarchy. This is why We the People have to fight tooth and nail to preserve it.
Back to our original question: Is jy gereed vir 'n ander Solyndra, patriotte? (Translation from Afrikaans to English: Are you ready for another Solyndra, patriots ?) Answer: Nope, especially when it involves money taken from me by force, using it to enrich Crony Capitalists, and handed to genocidal maniacs.
(Translation from Afrikaans to English: Are you ready for another Solyndra, patriots ?)
***
From the Export-Import Bank of The United States:
***
"JOHANNESBURG, SOUTH AFRICA: The Export-Import Bank of the United States (Ex-Im Bank) and the Industrial Development Corp. of South Africa Ltd. (IDC) today signed a Declaration of Intent (DoI) to help advance the South African government’s Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) and the South African Renewable Initiative (SARi). Under the agreement, Ex-Im Bank will assist in financing up to $2 billion worth of U.S. technologies, products and services to South Africa’s energy sector, with an emphasis on clean-energy development.
Signing the DOI were Fred P. Hochberg, Ex-Im Bank chairman and president; Geoffrey Quena, chief executive officer of the IDC; and Gert Gouws, chief financial officer of the IDC. The signing took place during the South Africa-United States Strategic Dialogue, which was hosted by U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.
'South Africa is a dynamic market that offers enormous opportunities for American companies,' said Chairman Hochberg. 'This agreement will help ensure that Ex-Im Bank continues to provide financing to South African buyers that want to buy high-quality U.S. goods and services. This partnership will help create jobs and lasting economic opportunities for both our countries.'
Established in 1940, the IDC is a South African national development finance institution set up to promote economic growth and industrial development. It is owned by the South African government under the supervision of the Economic Development department. The IDC's primary objectives are to contribute to the creation of balanced, sustainable economic growth in South Africa and on the rest of the continent.
Ex-Im Bank is open in over 180 countries and has identified nine key markets that offer great potential for U.S. exports. South Africa was chosen as one of these markets due to the size of its economy and close trading and investment ties to the United States. South Africa is the largest economy in Africa and the 29th largest economy in the world. Its GDP growth rate is expected to be 2.2 percent in 2012 and 2.7 percent in 2013.
As the largest U.S. export market in sub-Saharan Africa with $7.3 billion of exports in 2011, South Africa is a key economic partner for the United States. Additionally, South Africa is seeking significant investments in the following sectors: power, aviation, transportation and mining, thus creating a demand for high-quality American products and services in these industries. Ex-Im Bank authorized more than $930 million in financing to support U.S. exports to South Africa in FY 2011."
http://www.exim.gov/pressrelease.cfm/1EA4777D-97F2-F40E-978564826E8D33A2/
***
Before we dig into this billion dollar man-made disaster, I guess we should learn exactly what the "Export-Import of The United States" actually is.
From the good folks at the Heritage Foundation:
***
"The Export-Import Bank provides taxpayer-subsidized loans to U.S. exporters. The bank’s charter will expire at the end of May. President Obama supports a four-year extension and, further, wants to increase the bank’s $100 billion loan limit by an additional $40 billion.
Speaking last week at Heritage, Rep. Justin Amash (R-MI) said the bank should be completely abolished. His legislation, the Export-Import Bank Termination Act, would end this form of corporate welfare.
'[The Ex-Im Bank] basically provides government-subsidized, essentially loans, low-interest payments, and all the rest to foreign corporations that receive exports from American companies,' Amash explained. 'It’s the kind of corporate welfare we should do away with. We should have a free-market system; taxpayers shouldn’t be on the hook for subsidized loans to anyone. I see it as just another Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac in the making and I have a bill to end it.'
Despite opposition from conservatives, House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-VA) and Minority Whip Steny Hoyer (D-MD) reportedly reached an agreement to extend the bank’s lending authority.
Supporters of the extension claim there is greater demand for the bank’s services because of combined effects of the collapse of the financial markets in 2008 and 2009 and the European debt crisis. Critics, however, complain that expanding the bank’s loan limit in this environment is asking for a repeat of Fannie and Freddie. Even at its best, the bank just picks winners of a few exporters and hopes there are no losers."
http://blog.heritage.org/2012/05/04/congressman-export-import-bank-is-a-case-of-corporate-welfare/
***
Give yourself a gold star, Dear Reader! You're right! This is not a good thing. In fact, it's about as good as a long term stay in a Turkish prison. The Export-Import Bank has loaned YOUR money to the likes of Pemex (the state oil company of Mexico) and Petrobras (the state oil company of Brazil). Think about that as you pay $3.80 a gallon at the pump. (Just make sure you haven't eaten in the last hour before doing so. The author bears no responsibility if you blow chunks in your car.)
But don't worry. You may be getting screwed, but at least someone is making money. That person is...wait for it...wait for it...
Yep! The Fuhrer himself, George $oros, has made a killing from this type of Crony Capitalism.
***
"His New York-based hedge-fund firm, Soros Fund Management LLC, sold 22 million U.S.-listed common shares of Petrobras, as the Brazilian oil company is known, according to a filing today with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Soros bought 5.8 million of the company’s U.S.-traded preferred shares.
Soros is taking advantage of the spread between the two types of U.S.-listed Petrobras shares, said Luis Maizel, president of LM Capital Group LLC, which manages about $4 billion. The common shares were 21 percent more expensive than preferred today, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.
Petrobras preferred shares have also a 10 percent additional dividend, said William Landers, a senior portfolio manager for Latin America at Blackrock Inc.
'Given that there will most likely never be a change in control in the company, I see no reason to pay a higher price for the common shares.' Brazil’s government controls Petrobras and has a majority stake of voting shares."
http://hotair.com/archives/2009/08/18/good-news-obama-backs-off-shore-drilling/
***
Angry yet ? No ? Well, I'm just gonna have to try harder. Fred Hochberg, the chairman of the Export-Import Bank is as dirty as they get.
From the Washington Compost :
***
"Hochberg is a longtime Democratic Party donor and was among the overnight guests in the Clinton White House. He was a bundler for both Hillary Clinton and Obama in 2008. During the 2008 election cycle, he donated more than $108,000, almost exclusively to Democratic candidates and the party. Hochberg was appointed by Clinton as a deputy and acting administrator of the Small Business Administration and ran that agency's transition effort under Obama. He has served as dean of the New School for Management and Urban Policy and on the boards of several public agencies, charitable organizations and private companies."
http://projects.washingtonpost.com/2009/federal-appointments/person/fred-p-hochberg/
***
And guess what ? The openly homosexual Hochberg flew through his Imperial Senate confirmation vote to head up the Export-Import bank. In fact, it was unanimous. (Way to go, Team -R. Way to go. Your courage is inspiring. /sarc) Now, at this point, I thought we'd be done with Fuhrer $oros, but I'm loaded with caffeine, and Bing is just so darn easy to use. (Memo to the bottom feeders in the arrogant and lazy mainstream media: Give it a try one day. Maybe, just maybe, you'll outscoop me one day. I doubt it, but why not give the old college a try ?)
When he's not doing the Crony Capitalism thing, Fred Hochberg likes to be a left-wing nutjob. He was a former board member of the Human Rights Campaign, a radical LGBT "rights" group. In 2008, it received $200, 000 from the $oros funded Open Society Institute. (H/T Discover the Networks ). In fact, the Human Rights Campaign is filled with raving left-wing commie lunatics.
From Discover the Networks:
***
"Meanwhile, other HRC personnel maintain close ties to all manner of leftwing political figures and activist groups:
Ty Cobb previously served as counsel to Senator Ted Kennedy.
Allison Herwitt was a former lobbyist with the National Abortion Rights Action League, now known as NARAL Pro-Choice America.
Darrin Hurwitz served as in-house legal counsel for America Coming Together.
Terry McGuire worked with the New Mexico League of Conservation Voters on behalf of John Kerry's 2004 presidential campaign.
Susanne Salkind was a regional field manager for NARAL Pro-Choice America.
Christine Sloane has held positions with Greenpeace USA and NARAL Pro-Choice North Carolina.
David M. Smith was communications director for Senator Ted Kennedy.
Joe Solomonese (HRC president) is the former CEO of EMILY’s List. He began his career working as an aide to Democratic governor Michael Dukakis of Massachusetts, and also assisted with Barney Frank’s 1990 congressional campaign.
David A.C. Turley worked for Barack Obama’s presidential campaign in 2008, after Hillary Clinton had dropped out of the race.
Cuc Vu worked for AFL-CIO and the SEIU alongside Eliseo Medina. She is also a founding board member of the Mi Familia Vota Education Fund and has served on the board of the National Immigration Forum. "
http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/printgroupProfile.asp?grpid=7619
***
Given the fact that the Export-Import Bank is infested with leftist corruption, it's no real surprise that it would bend over backwards for the communist African National Congress government that's running South Africa into the ground. (Regardless of what the lapdogs in the arrogant and lazy mainstream media would have you believe, South Africa simply traded one tyranny for another when the socialist Nationalist government, which instituted Apartheid, fell and was replaced by the ANC, who at one point had death camps---I'm sorry---"reeducation camps" in Angola. I throw up a little in my mouth every time some lib journalist calls Nelson Mandela a "civil rights activist".)
In fact, Genocide Watch (not exactly a right-wing outfit) had this to say about the deteriorating conditions in South Africa:
***
"After many years when such songs were no longer sung, in 2010, prominent members of the ANC Youth League, in particular Julius Malema, President of the ANC Youth League, openly sang the 'Shoot the Boer' song at ANC Youth League rallies. Not only did revival of the song strike fear into the hearts of Boer farmers, but it has actually been sung during attacks on white farmers. It is an incitement to murder white Afrikaner farmers. Over 3000 white farmers have been murdered since 1994. The South African police have not made investigation and prosecution of these farm murders a priority, dismissing them as crimes by common criminals.
The government has disbanded the commando units of white farmers that once protected their farms, and has passed laws to confiscate the farmers’ weapons. Disarmament of a targeted group is one of the surest early warning signs of future genocidal killings. A recent outbreak of violent farm invasions has led to casualties among white South Africans. The farm invasions are direct results of calls by Julius Malema and his Deputy, Ronald Lamola for whites to give up their land without compensation, or face violence by angry black youths 'flooding their farms.' "
http://www.genocidewatch.org/southafrica.html
***
In other words, South Africa is about to turn into Zimbabwe. Just ask South African president (and wannabe genocidal dictator) Jacob Zuma. Again, from Genocide Watch:
***
"President Jacob Zuma sang 'Shoot the Boer' at the ANC Centenary Celebration event in January of 2012. He claimed that its use at the ANC Centenary was not intended as hate speech, but rather to commemorate the struggle against apartheid. Despite President Zuma’s proclaimed intent, his singing of the song may be contributing to an increasingly hostile environment that threatens the safety of white South Africans. The number of murders of Boer farmers has increased each month in 2012."
http://www.genocidewatch.org/southafrica.html
***
Ladies and gentlemen, should our tax dollars be going to maniacs like this ? Would this be any different than handing billions of dollars to Idi Amin or Papa Doc ? I'll freely admit that I'm somewhat biased since I have some Afrikaner bloed in me, but c'mon! How much more blatant does this need to be ? (I'm also a proud Zionist Jew in addition to being a natural born American Conservative. Needless to say, I'm probably the most politically unacceptable human being on God's green and cooling Earth. Oh, how I relish it!)
Aside from the fact that "green" energy is nothing more than commie snake oil and that there's a very good chance the loan will never be repaid since South Africa is drifting closer and closer to civil war, South Africa doesn't even need the money. If it wanted to waste billions on solar panels, it could use its own money. South Africa is the fourth largest gold producer in the world and its fifth largest diamond producer. The only reason South Africa is "poor" (compared to the United States, but certainly not when compared to the rest of Africa) is its government. The Apartheid Nationalist government was a collectivist nightmare and the African National Congress is even worse. South Africa has never had a true free market economic system and the end result of that is its current societal anarchy. This is why We the People have to fight tooth and nail to preserve it.
Back to our original question: Is jy gereed vir 'n ander Solyndra, patriotte? (Translation from Afrikaans to English: Are you ready for another Solyndra, patriots ?) Answer: Nope, especially when it involves money taken from me by force, using it to enrich Crony Capitalists, and handed to genocidal maniacs.
What Will The End Of The United States Look Like ?
As we stand at the edge of complete economic, political, and social
disaster as a nation, I can't help but wonder what the end of the United
States will look like. Will it look like Weimar Germany, with its
hyperinflation and street battles between socialists (Yes, the Nazis
were socialists) and communists ? Will it look like Greece, a bankrupted
social democracy with absolutely no chance of ever righting the ship ?
Will it look like the mindless mass murders that were the hallmarks of
the French and Russian Revoulutions ?
An argument can be made for each of the examples I've listed above. With the Federal Reserve printing money like there's no tomorrow, the hyperinflation and resulting chaos of the Weimar Republic is certainly possible. With 100 trillion dollars in unpaid liabilities due to entitlements, the United States certainly has a chance to become Greece. With the constant attacks on Christianity and Judaism by the Anti-God Left, a French Revolution of sorts on American soil is certainly possible, and as Occupy Wall Street showed in its own incompetent way, a violent Russian Revolution of sorts on American soil may be in our not-so-distant future.
Or could we become post-apartheid South Africa, a relatively wealthy and modern country heading to utter collapse due to racial violence, an out of control leftist government, and a non-existent immigration policy ?
Before we get started, let me make something crystal clear. The fall of apartheid in South Africa was one of mankind's better moments. Apartheid was an inhuman, vile system. As Ayn Rand pointed out in the Virtue of Selfishness:
***
"Racism is the lowest, most crudely primitive form of collectivism. It is the notion of ascribing moral, social or political significance to a man’s genetic lineage—the notion that a man’s intellectual and characterological traits are produced and transmitted by his internal body chemistry. Which means, in practice, that a man is to be judged, not by his own character and actions, but by the characters and actions of a collective of ancestors.
Racism claims that the content of a man’s mind (not his cognitive apparatus, but its content) is inherited; that a man’s convictions, values and character are determined before he is born, by physical factors beyond his control. This is the caveman’s version of the doctrine of innate ideas—or of inherited knowledge—which has been thoroughly refuted by philosophy and science. Racism is a doctrine of, by and for brutes. It is a barnyard or stock-farm version of collectivism, appropriate to a mentality that differentiates between various breeds of animals, but not between animals and men.
Like every form of determinism, racism invalidates the specific attribute which distinguishes man from all other living species: his rational faculty. Racism negates two aspects of man’s life: reason and choice, or mind and morality, replacing them with chemical predestination."
***
Apartheid wasn't a creation of the Right. Like every other social illness of the 19th and 20th centuries, apartheid was a creation of the Left, much like segregation in the South.
As economist Thomas Hazlett wrote:
***
"The now-defunct apartheid system of South Africa presented a fascinating instance of interest-group competition for political advantage. In light of the extreme human rights abuses stemming from apartheid, it is remarkable that so little attention has been paid to the economic foundations of that torturous social structure. The conventional view is that apartheid was devised by affluent whites to suppress poor blacks. In fact, the system sprang from class warfare and was largely the creation of white workers struggling against both the black majority and white capitalists. Apartheid was born in the political victory of radical white trade unions over both of their rivals. In short, this cruelly oppressive economic system was socialism with a racist face."
http://www.econlib.org/library/Enc/Apartheid.html#abouttheauthor
***
Apartheid was basically begun as a system to protect white union miners from competition from black non-union miners in the early 1900's. (In other words, they have the same racist origin that American unions do.) The National Party government that made apartheid the law of the land in South Africa was a socialist/fascist dictatorship. (One of the battle cries of the apartheid regime was "Workers of the world unite, fight for a white South Africa!")
After the election of Nelson Mandela (a murdering terrorist, despite the accolades heaped on him by the arrogant and lazy mainstream media) in 1994, South Africa began to crumble. Mandela's party, the African National Congress (ANC), wasn't at all interested in building the "Rainbow Nation" that he so waxed so eloquently about. It was a Marxist party hell bent on retribution and the redistribution of wealth. (As an aside note, the National Party ended up merging with the ANC. Collectivists of a feather always flock together.)
A new South African Constitution was written by the ANC which institutionalized the redistribution of wealth. Instead of being a charter of negative liberties like the US Constitution, the South African Constitution was intended to be a license for the South African government to do whatever it wanted for the "common good" of the people. For example, from the South African Constitution:
***
"A person or community whose tenure of land is legally insecure as a result of past racially discriminatory laws or practices is entitled, to the extent provided by an Act of Parliament, either to tenure which is legally secure or to comparable redress.
A person or community dispossessed of property after 19 June 1913 as a result of past racially discriminatory laws or practices is entitled, to the extent provided by an Act of Parliament, either to restitution of that property or to equitable redress.
No provision of this section may impede the state from taking legislative and other measures to achieve land, water and related reform, in order to redress the results of past racial discrimination, provided that any departure from the provisions of this section is in accordance with the provisions of section 36(1)."
***
In other words, property rights and individual sovereignty in South Africa no longer exist. For example, an Afrikaner farmer could lose his farm because of the actions of a long-dead distant relative. This is a complete and total breakdown of the civil society, since it punishes individuals for for the actions of others.
The South African Constitution also guarantees that all citizens have the right to housing, food, water, public assistance, a healthy environment, and secondary education, much like the old Soviet Constitution. Also like the old Soviet Constitution, it didn't produce a utopia, it produced a dystopia. No government is capable of such largesse, it simply isn't humanly possible, even for a relatively wealthy nation like South Africa. Anger and hatred became (particularly against the white Afrikaner minority) became the norm. Roving gangs of black youths, egged on by ANC Youth League leader Julius Malema, began terrorizing Afrikaner farmers. The reasoning behind it was this: If the government can't give it to us fast enough, we'll simply take it because we have a right to it. (Since 1994, over 3000 Afrikaner farmers have been murdered. The vast majority of these crimes aren't investigated by police and are chalked up to common criminals, according to Genocide Watch.)
Poverty grew quickly in the post apatheid years. Shanty towns around major cities grew at an alarming rate. Crime quickly became uncontrollable. (The city of Johannesberg, once a major center of culture in the world, quickly became the world's most crime ridden city.) Unemployment became rampant. The immigration system broke down as refugees from Malawi, Mozambique, Nigeria, and Zimbabwe flooded over South Africa's borders, adding not only more crime and additional burden to the welfare state, but more racial tensions.
This, ladies and gentlemen, is where America is heading. Like South Africa, we have a government that is more interested in the redistribution of wealth than anything else. The attacks on ranchers in southern Arizona by rampaging illegal aliens from Mexico may not have had tragic the loss of life that the attacks on Afrikaner farms have had, but the situations are certainly similiar. We've already seen how the entitlement mentality creates poverty and crime in our inner cities. How much longer until that situation devolves into shanty towns ? As far as racial tensions go(especially ones that could lead to violence), they're only going to get worse with leftist race hustlers like Barack Obama, Joe Biden, Nancy Pelosi, Al Sharpton, and Jesse Jackson running amok.
It may have took us a hundred years to get here, but we don't have a hundred years to fix it, that's for sure.
God help us all.
An argument can be made for each of the examples I've listed above. With the Federal Reserve printing money like there's no tomorrow, the hyperinflation and resulting chaos of the Weimar Republic is certainly possible. With 100 trillion dollars in unpaid liabilities due to entitlements, the United States certainly has a chance to become Greece. With the constant attacks on Christianity and Judaism by the Anti-God Left, a French Revolution of sorts on American soil is certainly possible, and as Occupy Wall Street showed in its own incompetent way, a violent Russian Revolution of sorts on American soil may be in our not-so-distant future.
Or could we become post-apartheid South Africa, a relatively wealthy and modern country heading to utter collapse due to racial violence, an out of control leftist government, and a non-existent immigration policy ?
Before we get started, let me make something crystal clear. The fall of apartheid in South Africa was one of mankind's better moments. Apartheid was an inhuman, vile system. As Ayn Rand pointed out in the Virtue of Selfishness:
***
"Racism is the lowest, most crudely primitive form of collectivism. It is the notion of ascribing moral, social or political significance to a man’s genetic lineage—the notion that a man’s intellectual and characterological traits are produced and transmitted by his internal body chemistry. Which means, in practice, that a man is to be judged, not by his own character and actions, but by the characters and actions of a collective of ancestors.
Racism claims that the content of a man’s mind (not his cognitive apparatus, but its content) is inherited; that a man’s convictions, values and character are determined before he is born, by physical factors beyond his control. This is the caveman’s version of the doctrine of innate ideas—or of inherited knowledge—which has been thoroughly refuted by philosophy and science. Racism is a doctrine of, by and for brutes. It is a barnyard or stock-farm version of collectivism, appropriate to a mentality that differentiates between various breeds of animals, but not between animals and men.
Like every form of determinism, racism invalidates the specific attribute which distinguishes man from all other living species: his rational faculty. Racism negates two aspects of man’s life: reason and choice, or mind and morality, replacing them with chemical predestination."
***
Apartheid wasn't a creation of the Right. Like every other social illness of the 19th and 20th centuries, apartheid was a creation of the Left, much like segregation in the South.
As economist Thomas Hazlett wrote:
***
"The now-defunct apartheid system of South Africa presented a fascinating instance of interest-group competition for political advantage. In light of the extreme human rights abuses stemming from apartheid, it is remarkable that so little attention has been paid to the economic foundations of that torturous social structure. The conventional view is that apartheid was devised by affluent whites to suppress poor blacks. In fact, the system sprang from class warfare and was largely the creation of white workers struggling against both the black majority and white capitalists. Apartheid was born in the political victory of radical white trade unions over both of their rivals. In short, this cruelly oppressive economic system was socialism with a racist face."
http://www.econlib.org/library/Enc/Apartheid.html#abouttheauthor
***
Apartheid was basically begun as a system to protect white union miners from competition from black non-union miners in the early 1900's. (In other words, they have the same racist origin that American unions do.) The National Party government that made apartheid the law of the land in South Africa was a socialist/fascist dictatorship. (One of the battle cries of the apartheid regime was "Workers of the world unite, fight for a white South Africa!")
After the election of Nelson Mandela (a murdering terrorist, despite the accolades heaped on him by the arrogant and lazy mainstream media) in 1994, South Africa began to crumble. Mandela's party, the African National Congress (ANC), wasn't at all interested in building the "Rainbow Nation" that he so waxed so eloquently about. It was a Marxist party hell bent on retribution and the redistribution of wealth. (As an aside note, the National Party ended up merging with the ANC. Collectivists of a feather always flock together.)
A new South African Constitution was written by the ANC which institutionalized the redistribution of wealth. Instead of being a charter of negative liberties like the US Constitution, the South African Constitution was intended to be a license for the South African government to do whatever it wanted for the "common good" of the people. For example, from the South African Constitution:
***
"A person or community whose tenure of land is legally insecure as a result of past racially discriminatory laws or practices is entitled, to the extent provided by an Act of Parliament, either to tenure which is legally secure or to comparable redress.
A person or community dispossessed of property after 19 June 1913 as a result of past racially discriminatory laws or practices is entitled, to the extent provided by an Act of Parliament, either to restitution of that property or to equitable redress.
No provision of this section may impede the state from taking legislative and other measures to achieve land, water and related reform, in order to redress the results of past racial discrimination, provided that any departure from the provisions of this section is in accordance with the provisions of section 36(1)."
***
In other words, property rights and individual sovereignty in South Africa no longer exist. For example, an Afrikaner farmer could lose his farm because of the actions of a long-dead distant relative. This is a complete and total breakdown of the civil society, since it punishes individuals for for the actions of others.
The South African Constitution also guarantees that all citizens have the right to housing, food, water, public assistance, a healthy environment, and secondary education, much like the old Soviet Constitution. Also like the old Soviet Constitution, it didn't produce a utopia, it produced a dystopia. No government is capable of such largesse, it simply isn't humanly possible, even for a relatively wealthy nation like South Africa. Anger and hatred became (particularly against the white Afrikaner minority) became the norm. Roving gangs of black youths, egged on by ANC Youth League leader Julius Malema, began terrorizing Afrikaner farmers. The reasoning behind it was this: If the government can't give it to us fast enough, we'll simply take it because we have a right to it. (Since 1994, over 3000 Afrikaner farmers have been murdered. The vast majority of these crimes aren't investigated by police and are chalked up to common criminals, according to Genocide Watch.)
Poverty grew quickly in the post apatheid years. Shanty towns around major cities grew at an alarming rate. Crime quickly became uncontrollable. (The city of Johannesberg, once a major center of culture in the world, quickly became the world's most crime ridden city.) Unemployment became rampant. The immigration system broke down as refugees from Malawi, Mozambique, Nigeria, and Zimbabwe flooded over South Africa's borders, adding not only more crime and additional burden to the welfare state, but more racial tensions.
This, ladies and gentlemen, is where America is heading. Like South Africa, we have a government that is more interested in the redistribution of wealth than anything else. The attacks on ranchers in southern Arizona by rampaging illegal aliens from Mexico may not have had tragic the loss of life that the attacks on Afrikaner farms have had, but the situations are certainly similiar. We've already seen how the entitlement mentality creates poverty and crime in our inner cities. How much longer until that situation devolves into shanty towns ? As far as racial tensions go(especially ones that could lead to violence), they're only going to get worse with leftist race hustlers like Barack Obama, Joe Biden, Nancy Pelosi, Al Sharpton, and Jesse Jackson running amok.
It may have took us a hundred years to get here, but we don't have a hundred years to fix it, that's for sure.
God help us all.
Obama Finally Creates Some Jobs! (Sarcasm Alert!)
There's been a lot talk that our Dear Leader, Barack Hussein Obama, hasn't created any jobs. Of course, this is blatantly untrue. Despite a busy schedule that consists of eating chicken poodle soup, persecuting Catholics, and allowing Islamonazi Iran build nuclear weapons, Obamugabe has indeed created jobs.
Hey, don't take my word for it. Check it out!
Heh....heh....heh......
Hey, don't take my word for it. Check it out!
 | ||||||
| http://miami.craigslist.org/mdc/npo/3349996914.html |
Heh....heh....heh......
Thursday, October 18, 2012
Your Kid Doesn't Need To Be Educated....He Needs To Indoctrinated!
There are many things one can expect from a Barack Hussein Obama
diatribe. The first thing you'll notice is a whole lot of mumbling and
stuttering, much like a poor soul suffering a mini-stroke. The second is
the occasional phoney-baloney "Malcolm X voice" (H/T Ann Coulter) if
he's PO'ed about something. (You know, things like FOX News, no more
chicken poodle soup, Benjamin Netanyahu, a lousy day at the links, that
sort of thing.) The third thing you'll notice is his incessant
cheerleading for federal interference in education, Constitution be
damned.
This cheerleading happens in almost every one of his rants. It doesn't matter if the subject is visiting all 57 states, telling Catholic organizations to shut the hell up already and pay for the condoms, or that the so-called "Arab Spring" is spontaneous eruption of Jeffersonian Democracy, you can bet the farm that Chairman Obama is going to somehow going to manage to mention how We the People need to "invest" more in our inefficient, union-infested, government-run schools.
Now why is that ?
One is tempted to say that our Kenyan Dictator needs to keep the various teacher unions happy so they keep filling his campaign coffers full. That's true, but only to a certain point. Teacher unions have nothing to do with education, they're all about leftist commie politics and supporting commie leftist politicians. Albert Shanker, founder of the United Federation of Teachers and president of the "American" Federation of Teachers, once famously quipped, "When school children start paying union dues, that's when I'll start representing the interests of children." In other words, the teacher unions will back any misfit or malcontent that runs for office with a -D after their name. It doesn't really matter if they're functionally illiterate like Joe Biteme, all that matters is that they're a member of the Democrat party in reasonably good standing. All that matters to teacher unions is keeping the gravy train of bloated benefits and pensions going. (A great example of this are the recent teacher strikes in Chairman Obama's own backyard. If you'll note, the teachers didn't give a crap that the Chicago school system struggles mightily to graduate 60% of its students. All they cared about about was making sure they got a bigger share of their neighbor's paycheck. When the strike ended, the teacher unions dutifully reattached to their collective lips to Rahm Emanuel's creepy ballerina ass.)
So then why does Barry keep up this charade, especially if it's something many teachers could care less about ?
It's all about indoctrination of the young, just like the Kosomol of the Soviet Union or the Hitler Jugend of Nazi Germany.
Let me repeat that so there's no misunderstanding whatsoever: It's all about indoctrination of the young. Our Dear Leader wants to indoctrinate your children. This is why he keeps insisting that the federal role in education keeps getting bigger and bigger, much like the deficit. Uncle Sam doesn't want you, he wants your children.
The Department of Education, under Obama sycophant Arne Duncan, is as political as it gets.
For example:
***
"June is LGBT Pride Month, and to kick off the month, and as part of ED’s Student Voices Sessions, the Secretary met with eight students from the Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network (GLSEN) and the Gay-Straight Alliance Network to hear directly from the students about their experiences and to discuss bullying and possible solutions."
http://www.ed.gov/blog/2012/06/lgbt-students-give-secretary-duncan-homework/
***
No, I'm not for bullying in our schools, but I sure don't like idea of the Federal Leviathan telling my children that the perversion of homosexuality is OK in contradiction of what I teach them at home. I also think that the schools themselves are more than able to stop bullying on their own. No one needs Big Brother's guidance on handling such situations.
Ah, but there's more:
***
" 'You are all partners and allies in reforming public education,' Secretary Arne Duncan said last week at the National Action Network’s 14th Annual Convention in Washington. 'An excellent education for very child is a moral and civic imperative, as well as an economic one. This issue is even bigger than education—it is an issue of social justice and economic security,' [Education Secretary Arne] Duncan said.
One takeaway from the conference is that the civil rights community has a long and distinguished history of taking courageous action to drive social change, and it will take collective will to make a difference in boosting the nation’s graduation rates and turning around our low-performing schools. 'Without equality in education there will never be equality in society. We have to do what’s right for our children and make education a priority,' said Rev. Al Sharpton [noted anti-semite, anti-white racist, and current host on PMSNBC] of the founder of the National Action Network.
Secretary Duncan explained that 'we have to have a strategy to build an economy that will last—and education is the centerpiece of it.' Duncan praised groups like the National Action Network for their work with communities, and said that 'we need to keep fighting together for strong local, state and national investments.' "
http://www.ed.gov/blog/2012/04/duncan-enlists-sharptons-civil-rights-network-in-education-reform/
***
Don't worry, greenies, you weren't left out. The Department of Education luvs you, too!
***
"Two weeks from today, Secretary Duncan will take the stage at the Green Schools National Conference in Denver, providing a high note at what is fast becoming the largest annual meeting of the green schools movement. The Secretary and other distinguished speakers, including Deputy Undersecretary for the U.S. Department of Agriculture Janey Thornton, mayors from several cities, and business leaders representing companies from Stonyfield Farm to Siemens, will address the green schools movement and how it can strengthen our economy, revitalize our schools and ensure access to green school benefits for all.
The Secretary’s appearance and the growing popularity of this conference signal a new milestone in green schools, coinciding with the inaugural year of U.S. Department of Education Green Ribbon Schools (ED-GRS) program. ED’s new Environmental Justice Strategy explains how ED-GRS is just one initiative supporting a goal at the very heart of ED’s mission: assuring equal educational opportunity for every student. ED-GRS, among other initiatives, helps suggest ways to address the adverse health and environmental conditions that disproportionately affect student achievement among minority and low-income populations."
http://www.ed.gov/blog/2012/02/a-green-revolution-for-all/
***
Ladies and gentlemen, I can't begin to describe how dangerous this is. If one only takes one lesson from history, it should be the fact that national governments and children are a terrible mix. The Soviets turned children against their parents. The Nazis not only turned children against their parents, they turned them into cannon fodder at the end of World War II. Is that what you want for YOUR children ?
On that cheery note, I leave you with this equally cheery note from George Orwell's 1984:
***
"With those children, he thought, that wretched woman must lead a life of terror. Another year, two years, and they would be watching her night and day for symptoms of unorthodoxy. Nearly all children nowadays were horrible. What was worst of all was that by means of such organizations as the Spies they were systematically turned into ungovernable little savages, and yet this produced in them no tendency whatever to rebel against the discipline of the Party. On the contrary, they adored the Party and everything connected with it. The songs, the processions, the banners, the hiking, the drilling with dummy rifles, the yelling of slogans, the worship of Big Brother -- it was all a sort of glorious game to them. All their ferocity was turned outwards, against the enemies of the State, against foreigners, traitors, saboteurs, thought-criminals. It was almost normal for people over thirty to be frightened of their own children. And with good reason, for hardly a week passed in which The Times did not carry a paragraph describing how some eavesdropping little sneak -- 'child hero' was the phrase generally used -- had overheard some compromising remark and denounced its parents to the Thought Police."
***
The Doomsday Clock is at 11:59:00....Tick-tock....Tick-tock....Tick-tock....
This cheerleading happens in almost every one of his rants. It doesn't matter if the subject is visiting all 57 states, telling Catholic organizations to shut the hell up already and pay for the condoms, or that the so-called "Arab Spring" is spontaneous eruption of Jeffersonian Democracy, you can bet the farm that Chairman Obama is going to somehow going to manage to mention how We the People need to "invest" more in our inefficient, union-infested, government-run schools.
Now why is that ?
One is tempted to say that our Kenyan Dictator needs to keep the various teacher unions happy so they keep filling his campaign coffers full. That's true, but only to a certain point. Teacher unions have nothing to do with education, they're all about leftist commie politics and supporting commie leftist politicians. Albert Shanker, founder of the United Federation of Teachers and president of the "American" Federation of Teachers, once famously quipped, "When school children start paying union dues, that's when I'll start representing the interests of children." In other words, the teacher unions will back any misfit or malcontent that runs for office with a -D after their name. It doesn't really matter if they're functionally illiterate like Joe Biteme, all that matters is that they're a member of the Democrat party in reasonably good standing. All that matters to teacher unions is keeping the gravy train of bloated benefits and pensions going. (A great example of this are the recent teacher strikes in Chairman Obama's own backyard. If you'll note, the teachers didn't give a crap that the Chicago school system struggles mightily to graduate 60% of its students. All they cared about about was making sure they got a bigger share of their neighbor's paycheck. When the strike ended, the teacher unions dutifully reattached to their collective lips to Rahm Emanuel's creepy ballerina ass.)
So then why does Barry keep up this charade, especially if it's something many teachers could care less about ?
It's all about indoctrination of the young, just like the Kosomol of the Soviet Union or the Hitler Jugend of Nazi Germany.
Let me repeat that so there's no misunderstanding whatsoever: It's all about indoctrination of the young. Our Dear Leader wants to indoctrinate your children. This is why he keeps insisting that the federal role in education keeps getting bigger and bigger, much like the deficit. Uncle Sam doesn't want you, he wants your children.
The Department of Education, under Obama sycophant Arne Duncan, is as political as it gets.
For example:
***
"June is LGBT Pride Month, and to kick off the month, and as part of ED’s Student Voices Sessions, the Secretary met with eight students from the Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network (GLSEN) and the Gay-Straight Alliance Network to hear directly from the students about their experiences and to discuss bullying and possible solutions."
http://www.ed.gov/blog/2012/06/lgbt-students-give-secretary-duncan-homework/
***
No, I'm not for bullying in our schools, but I sure don't like idea of the Federal Leviathan telling my children that the perversion of homosexuality is OK in contradiction of what I teach them at home. I also think that the schools themselves are more than able to stop bullying on their own. No one needs Big Brother's guidance on handling such situations.
Ah, but there's more:
***
" 'You are all partners and allies in reforming public education,' Secretary Arne Duncan said last week at the National Action Network’s 14th Annual Convention in Washington. 'An excellent education for very child is a moral and civic imperative, as well as an economic one. This issue is even bigger than education—it is an issue of social justice and economic security,' [Education Secretary Arne] Duncan said.
One takeaway from the conference is that the civil rights community has a long and distinguished history of taking courageous action to drive social change, and it will take collective will to make a difference in boosting the nation’s graduation rates and turning around our low-performing schools. 'Without equality in education there will never be equality in society. We have to do what’s right for our children and make education a priority,' said Rev. Al Sharpton [noted anti-semite, anti-white racist, and current host on PMSNBC] of the founder of the National Action Network.
Secretary Duncan explained that 'we have to have a strategy to build an economy that will last—and education is the centerpiece of it.' Duncan praised groups like the National Action Network for their work with communities, and said that 'we need to keep fighting together for strong local, state and national investments.' "
http://www.ed.gov/blog/2012/04/duncan-enlists-sharptons-civil-rights-network-in-education-reform/
***
Don't worry, greenies, you weren't left out. The Department of Education luvs you, too!
***
"Two weeks from today, Secretary Duncan will take the stage at the Green Schools National Conference in Denver, providing a high note at what is fast becoming the largest annual meeting of the green schools movement. The Secretary and other distinguished speakers, including Deputy Undersecretary for the U.S. Department of Agriculture Janey Thornton, mayors from several cities, and business leaders representing companies from Stonyfield Farm to Siemens, will address the green schools movement and how it can strengthen our economy, revitalize our schools and ensure access to green school benefits for all.
The Secretary’s appearance and the growing popularity of this conference signal a new milestone in green schools, coinciding with the inaugural year of U.S. Department of Education Green Ribbon Schools (ED-GRS) program. ED’s new Environmental Justice Strategy explains how ED-GRS is just one initiative supporting a goal at the very heart of ED’s mission: assuring equal educational opportunity for every student. ED-GRS, among other initiatives, helps suggest ways to address the adverse health and environmental conditions that disproportionately affect student achievement among minority and low-income populations."
http://www.ed.gov/blog/2012/02/a-green-revolution-for-all/
***
Ladies and gentlemen, I can't begin to describe how dangerous this is. If one only takes one lesson from history, it should be the fact that national governments and children are a terrible mix. The Soviets turned children against their parents. The Nazis not only turned children against their parents, they turned them into cannon fodder at the end of World War II. Is that what you want for YOUR children ?
On that cheery note, I leave you with this equally cheery note from George Orwell's 1984:
***
"With those children, he thought, that wretched woman must lead a life of terror. Another year, two years, and they would be watching her night and day for symptoms of unorthodoxy. Nearly all children nowadays were horrible. What was worst of all was that by means of such organizations as the Spies they were systematically turned into ungovernable little savages, and yet this produced in them no tendency whatever to rebel against the discipline of the Party. On the contrary, they adored the Party and everything connected with it. The songs, the processions, the banners, the hiking, the drilling with dummy rifles, the yelling of slogans, the worship of Big Brother -- it was all a sort of glorious game to them. All their ferocity was turned outwards, against the enemies of the State, against foreigners, traitors, saboteurs, thought-criminals. It was almost normal for people over thirty to be frightened of their own children. And with good reason, for hardly a week passed in which The Times did not carry a paragraph describing how some eavesdropping little sneak -- 'child hero' was the phrase generally used -- had overheard some compromising remark and denounced its parents to the Thought Police."
***
The Doomsday Clock is at 11:59:00....Tick-tock....Tick-tock....Tick-tock....
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)